Live data from Hacker News

RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

watoday.com.au

21–30 of 111 posts

Re: RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

#21

"The graphical software package used by [Note Printing Australia] has no copy-paste mechanism and no spelling or grammar check. The text was manually typed in and misspelt at this point," according to a report into the error from the printing agency, dated January 11 this year."

It would be funny if note forgers would use the same software for improved authenticity, re-type the text, and do it correctly - the forged notes could be easily spotted since they use the correct text.

Re: RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

#23

"The graphical software package used by [Note Printing Australia] has no copy-paste mechanism and no spelling or grammar check. The text was manually typed in and misspelt at this point," according to a report into the error from the printing agency, dated January 11 this year."

It’s amazing how so many issues that are nominally caused by human error are actually the result of bad design.

Of course, bad design is also caused by human error.

Re: RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

#24

"The graphical software package used by [Note Printing Australia] has no copy-paste mechanism and no spelling or grammar check. The text was manually typed in and misspelt at this point," according to a report into the error from the printing agency, dated January 11 this year."

It would be funny if note forgers would use the same software for improved authenticity, re-type the text, and do it correctly - the forged notes could be easily spotted since they use the correct text.

Reminds me of: https://www.gislounge.com/map-traps-intentional-mapping-erro...

Re: RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

#25
post #14

Not nearly as bad as the Canadian $20 note depicting a Norwegian maple leaf (7 points) instead of a Canadian maple (5 points).

Supposedly that is a stylized amalgam of 10 different native maple trees.

The sugar maple is an eastern tree; the amalgam is supposed to be more broadly representative.

Re: RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

#26
The funny thing is that this typo managed to pass through the inspection/review of so many different people. Related to the “copy & paste” between programs, this depends from which point of view someone looks at it, having to type/input information manually avoids copy&paste mistakes but on the other hand introduces human errors. That’s the reason a good company should have reviews and a clear process for its software and documentation.

Re: RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

#27
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Specialist software for industry can be absurdly shit sometimes. There are seemingly tons of niche software packages used in business that cost thousands per copy and lack even the most rudimentary features normally found in most software.

I don't know about other OS, but in Windows it's absurdly difficult to build an input mechanism that doesn't allow pasting.

You should try using Citrix remote connection software in a business environment :-)

Re: RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

#28

Apparently they also lacked human editors with grade-school educations.

Can you cite something linking education level with an improved ability to spot typographical errors? According to the psychologist quoted in this article[0]/study our inability to spot typos might be an innate limitation of how our brains process information, rather than a lack of intelligence/education. [0] https://www.wired.com/2014/08/wuwt-typos/

agreed - as per the original glib response, "nobody died". Life/death situations are the ones where our brains should be finely tuned & trainable.

Re: RBA not fazed by Australian $50 note typo

#30
post #29

Once they correct the mistake, those notes will be worth a fortune to collectors in a couple decades. Collectors love errors. And since the history is well documented online you get a bonus of free provenance.

Not with 480 million of them circulated, it won't be.
Post reply on HN