Live data from Hacker News

Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

tapmydata.com

31–40 of 52 posts

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#31
Privacy-friendly?

These are just alternatives to Google. Some are privacy-oriented, but others are just not Google. They may, in fact, be worse than Google.

That's not a bad list. Even if the alternatives are not "private", not putting all your eggs in one basket may be a good idea.

Noteworthy is the lack of Microsoft products in that list. Sure Microsoft isn't known for being the champion of privacy, but neither are Dropbox and Slack.

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#32
post #23

How are these alternatives "privacy-friendly"? I'm pretty sure Opera, Vimeo and many others are monetized and include advertising. Also, why does something like Google Authenticator need a "privacy-friendly" alternative when it doesn't even need Internet connectivity to work? Don't get me wrong, we should put down Google products, but are the ones listed here really any better for privacy and security?

Yet Google Authenticator requests full network access. An alternative like AndOTP doesn't.

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#33

https://alternativeto.net/ not all results will be privacy focused. some other alternatives Browser waterfox and other forks search yacy email self hosted various vps serves sheets/docs own/next cloud. libre/open office video hooktube invidius adwords a-ads dns opennic drive sia ipfs storj... hangouts keybase bitmessage tox images pixeldrain(sia)

Don’t host your own email. Unless you don’t want anyone to be able receive your emails.

I just started hosting my own email and haven't had trouble emailing Gmail, though I have limited testing. I have SPF, dkim and dmarc all set up, would that help?

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#35
Please consider adding rsync.net as a privacy friendly[1] alternative to gdrive, etc.

We just added the 'rclone'[2] binary executable to our (very strictly limited) environment which basically allows you to send/recv to and from any cloud service.

So, not just a good alternative to google drive (et. al) but a very useful "cloud storage swiss army knife" in general.

[1] https://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/canary.txt [2] https://rclone.org/

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#36
post #35

Please consider adding rsync.net as a privacy friendly[1] alternative to gdrive, etc. We just added the 'rclone'[2] binary executable to our (very strictly limited) environment which basically allows you to send/recv to and from any cloud service . So, not just a good alternative to google drive (et. al) but a very useful "cloud storage swiss army knife" in general. [1] https://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/canary.…

I have been using rsync.net for years (with attic, borg and now restic) and am very happy with the service.

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#37
post #16

I've been looking for an alternative to Google Docs/Sheets/Slides/etc for a while and I've seen these couple of suggestions come up a few times. Each time I look at them, I find their websites to be incomprehensible to what their product actually _is_. The worst of them is Coda. Looking at their landing page, I have NO idea what Coda is or does. None of the other alternatives seem to do what I want easily. I want to…

I thought it looked neat and wanted to try it. Click the sign up button and it asks me to log in with Google. No other options. The easiest way to get me to ditch a product is to use Google or Facebook for authentication. Right off the bat, I’m thinking monetizing user data is the primary component of the business model. It’s guilt by association at this point. Besides, I don’t use Google or Facebook and I’m not about to start now.

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#38
What's missing from the list is Android and Google Play, the number one spy device in my house.

As far as I know there is only iOS and Android forks. Android forks are an option if your phone supports it, but living without Google Play (Services) limits your app choices a lot.

Windows Phone and Blackberry sadly gave up the battle. Others like Ubuntu phone and Firefox OS never really materialised.

As far as Google Play alternatives go, there is the Amazon store and F-droid, but good luck finding even the most basic Android apps on either.

Honestly, I'd settle for a dumbphone with WhatsApp(extremely widely used here) and a browser. Almost feels like we're coming full-circle to the first iPhone with very few native apps and powerful web app capabilities.

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#39

For me the biggest problem is Youtube. The other solutions are not in the same level of quality/quantity. DuckDuckGo feels way better as a product to me (using sometimes the bang to use google in privacy mode). And ProtonMail is good enough.

I'm not certainly sure if this helps but there's youtube front-end interface: https://www.invidio.us/

Re: Privacy-friendly alternatives to Google

#40
post #32
post #23

How are these alternatives "privacy-friendly"? I'm pretty sure Opera, Vimeo and many others are monetized and include advertising. Also, why does something like Google Authenticator need a "privacy-friendly" alternative when it doesn't even need Internet connectivity to work? Don't get me wrong, we should put down Google products, but are the ones listed here really any better for privacy and security?

Yet Google Authenticator requests full network access. An alternative like AndOTP doesn't.

Presumably for https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/2653433?visit_id=...
Post reply on HN