Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm European, I didn't even know automatic transmission existed before I was 30 :) The gearstick is one control with a very limited set of never-changing options that you have to use all the time, basically the best you can get as muscle-memory goes. Despite all this, it's not used where hyper-attention on the road is really necessary, i.e. in racing. And where do we get gearshift controls in racing? On the wheel.
There are plenty of racing cars with stick shifts in them. Or are you thinking of a specific type of racing?
Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
871–880 of 974 posts
Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#872Earlier quoted context omitted.
None of this is untrue with touchscreens. They also have wires and connectors and must be certified.
Have you ever seen behind the dashboard of a modern car? It's a monstrous tangle of wiring, with inch-thick cabling bundles and dozens or hundreds of connectors. A touchscreen-centric interface like the Tesla Model 3 could easily save several kilos of cables and connectors. There's a huge amount of labour involved in installing all that wiring and a huge number of opportunities for failure. I support Mazda's efforts…
It blows my mind away how you can even begin to compare the predicted reliability of a complex touchscreen interface stuffed with active electronics to dumb buttons and wires with a straight face, let alone what fielded production units only a few years in have clearly demonstrated.
[1] https://www.thedrive.com/tech/27989/teslas-screen-saga-shows...
Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#873Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#874Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#875Earlier quoted context omitted.
> just another device you interact with in various ways and it also happens to be able to get you from point A to point B. just another device which can kill you and others in a split second if you are in the wrong place at the wrong time.
yes. what's your point
Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#876Earlier quoted context omitted.
> One thing that might not be obvious - this controller is just below the steering wheel and you press it from the back side. It's almost invisible and it feels very natural. True. Another thing that might not be obvious is that they are fixed on the steering wheel, so they are always in the same position relative the your hands, just like the gear levers in a modern Formula 1 car.
I am 99% sure my Clio had it attached to the steering column, so the controls were always in the same place regardless of the steering wheel angle. I actually found this made them easier to find, as they're always in the same place relative to the rest of you. Controls on the steering wheel by contrast (as found in, e.g., my current car) move as the wheel rotates, and for some reason I can never quite keep track of w…
http://www.burdigala-encheres.com/upload/biens/7186/191833.j...
> The Clio also had the horn button on the indicator stalk. The in-car UX was super on point
Yes, that was the Renault trademark :)
> Good quality stereo, too.
Probably one of the best for the price tag.
Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#877Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish they did that in the EU. Reversing cameras are massively useful, especially in vehicles with low visibility such as the Toyota CH-R.
Really? As much as I like the comfort of the rear radars for big vehicles, I’ve always found the camera a bit useless
Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#878Touch screens require you to look at them to use them. Physical knobs and buttons do not. You're supposed to look at the road, not at a touchscreen.
Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#879Re: Mazda is purging touchscreens from its vehicles
#880What we need is to put all the controls both within sign and within reach of the driver, that means in and around the steering wheel, just like it was done in sport cars where driver focus is essential.