Live data from Hacker News

Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

wsj.com

71–80 of 277 posts

Re: Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

#71
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what do you think is weird or bad about it? it's a pretty appropriate name for a currency

Libra is the portuguese word for pound sterling

it's the latin word for a scale and is the root of many money-related words in european languages

Re: Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

#73
post #62

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because not everyone cares about "complete sovereignty"? There's a reason why all these companies are still successful, most people don't care that much about their privacy or other dignities if it means convenience.

Then I see no difference from USD. What exactly is the point? Yet another payment method?

Facebook is trying to create a common currency accessible to a global userbase whose transmission bypasses traditional banking rails. It'll be super convenient, even the USD can't do that.

This combined with Whatsapp for Business is going to be game changing for SMEs in developing markets.

Do I want to keep my savings in it? Probably not...

Re: Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

#74
post #66

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You're forgetting how much credit card transaction suck. As I see it this is the main problem facebook could solve through sheer volume of use: microtransactions. Granted this is about the worst way this future could come about....

If Libra is a threat to credit cards, then why are Visa and MasterCard investing at least $10M each in it?

Isn't this a lot like asking why Tyson invested in Beyond Meat when BYND is a threat to Tyson? Maybe you could call this defensively "investing in the future" of your industry (if this turns out to be anything at all).

Re: Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

#75

I've met a hell of a lot of authoritarians in the crypto scene over the past decade. Blockchain technology is a centralized datastore so of course it's a tool for global authoritarianism; think IBM in the 1930s selling slow databases to the Nazi's so they can keep a universal ledger of the Jews. P2P distributed architectures such as Holochain which actually decentralize data and control are far more positive paradigm…

You wrote: "Blockchain technology is a centralized datastore". care to explain?

Re: Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

#76

Will this be a centralized currency?

It’s Mark “I’m CEO B!t(h” Zuckerberg. Do you think he’d start a currency he wouldn’t be able to use to spy on every user?

I'm not really interested in the spying aspect of it, since most cryptocurrencies make all transaction information public in their blockchains.

My interest is in who controls issuance of the currency itself and if that control is decentralized or controlled by a central entity, like Facebook.

Re: Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

#77

Can't read the article. What is it backed by? Where's this information coming from? I can't find any press release or sources that aren't publishers themselves—this smells like insubstantial technology and bought hype (not that it won't work...).

Its backed by some large companies and a bunch of money:

"The financial and e-commerce companies, venture capitalists and telecommunications firms will invest around $10 million each in a consortium that will govern the digital coin, called Libra, according to people familiar with the matter. The money would be used to fund the creation of the coin, which will be pegged to a basket of government-issued currencies to avoid the wild swings that have dogged other cryptocurrencies, they said."

Re: Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

#78
post #18

I feel like this move will almost guarantee anti-trust actions. Although if nothing has already, who knows.

What makes you think that?

Just that Facebook influencing public opinion, elections, and currency seems like it would be too much for the government to allow.

Re: Facebook’s New Cryptocurrency Gets Big Backers

#80
post #44
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

what do you think is weird or bad about it? it's a pretty appropriate name for a currency

Sure, but not one owned by Facebook. It's a sick joke.

Ok, but please don't post unsubstantive comments here.
Post reply on HN