Earlier quoted context omitted.
$25k after inflation. I had no idea it was that expensive!
It was cheap, compared to the Xerox Star it was "inspired" by...
Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
41–50 of 186 posts
Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#42Trying to understand Steve Jobs is an effort in futility I know, but I've never understood what he was thinking around this time. He refused to accept responsibility for his daughter when she was born in 1978, and even 5 years later, he was still questioning the accuracy of DNA paternity tests in Time Magazine and despite being a multi-millionaire, only grudgingly paying $500 a month for child support. But then he go…
Combined with his emotional issues, rage, temper - it resulted in a manic back & forth. When he wanted to be magnanimous or kind, he could be, and it always had to be strictly on his terms and only if he didn't feel forced into it in any manner (to the far end of that spectrum, like he'd do it only when it was least expected, as an amplification device). If anything attempted to force his hand, or he perceived such, he very aggressively rebelled against it in all cases (you see that pattern over and over again throughout his history with people and business). It had to be on his terms, or there would be no terms at all. When he could reorient the context of Lisa (his daughter) to his terms, as and when he saw fit, then it became acceptable. You can see some of that behavior in action, in Lisa's description of what it was like to live with Steve when she was younger (my way or the highway atmosphere; he had to feel in control). He seemingly struggled to control his emotions for most of his life, which must have been wildly frustrating for someone like him. That lack of personal emotional control might explain a control over-compensation directed at other things in his life, the need to control everything else (and perhaps a behavior where if he felt in control of everything else around him, then he could keep the other things from setting off his emotions, which he couldn't control properly).
That's my read on it anyway.
Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#43This makes the new Mac Pro look like a bargain... especially after you adjust for inflation.
$25k after inflation. I had no idea it was that expensive!
Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#44Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
$25k after inflation. I had no idea it was that expensive!
I am really curious about how anyone could afford computers at these prices in the 1980s. I guess my family was really poor then. We had a C64 and later an Amiga.
Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#46Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am really curious about how anyone could afford computers at these prices in the 1980s. I guess my family was really poor then. We had a C64 and later an Amiga.
They didn't unless they were well off. Only 8% of houses had a computer in 1984. 15% by the end of the decade. C64 was $595 new, if you had one I doubt your family was poor.
Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#47Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#48I was surprised seeing Steve Jobs wearing a suit in that picture.
Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
$25k after inflation. I had no idea it was that expensive!
The IBM PC in 1981 cost $4,500 to $8,500 in today's money. The original Mac would cost $6,000 if released today. Computers have become a great deal cheaper in the ensuing decades.
Today, a Rasbpi costs $5.
Holy freakin' cow.
Re: Apple Reveals ‘Lisa’, Its $50M Gamble (1983)
#50Earlier quoted context omitted.
$25k after inflation. I had no idea it was that expensive!
I am really curious about how anyone could afford computers at these prices in the 1980s. I guess my family was really poor then. We had a C64 and later an Amiga.
But Lisa's pricing made the Mac more appealing. It wasn't exactly affordable, but you were getting maybe a third of a Lisa - including the new GUI, which was obviously the future [tm] compared to the Apple II - at less than a third of the price.
Even at the prices being charged, the Mac and PC were competitive with previous standards, and affordable enough to have a sizeable market among affluent middle class users.
They offered more than the old S-100 boxes did, for the same or less money. And they were much cheaper and more "personal" than industrial minis like the PDP-11 and the VAX.