Live data from Hacker News

We Have Four Years to Save Ourselves from Climate Change, Harvard Scientist Says

forbes.com

1–10 of 152 posts

Re: We Have Four Years to Save Ourselves from Climate Change, Harvard Scientist Says

#4
post #3

I remember Al Gore saying we got 10 years in 2006. In fact this type of rhetoric has been going on for centuries. [1] [1] https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/10/08/the-ever-receding-cli...

That's the downside of boys crying wolf... when the actual wolf comes we don't listen.

Re: We Have Four Years to Save Ourselves from Climate Change, Harvard Scientist Says

#5
post #3

I remember Al Gore saying we got 10 years in 2006. In fact this type of rhetoric has been going on for centuries. [1] [1] https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/10/08/the-ever-receding-cli...

They are an apocalyptic death cult. The end is nigh submit to the elite or forever perish. How is submitting to the 1% going to save earth? They used to say by the end of the century. Year after year their predictions fail and the cult marches on.

Re: We Have Four Years to Save Ourselves from Climate Change, Harvard Scientist Says

#8
post #3

I remember Al Gore saying we got 10 years in 2006. In fact this type of rhetoric has been going on for centuries. [1] [1] https://wattsupwiththat.com/2018/10/08/the-ever-receding-cli...

1. Al Gore didn't say this, James Anderson did. James Anderson is a "Harvard University professor of atmospheric chemistry best known for establishing that chlorofluorocarbons were damaging the Ozone Layer."

2. You're right about the rhetoric - it has been around for centuries but so have major ecological disasters. The Dust Bowl alone forced tens of thousands of poverty-stricken families to abandon their farms, unable to pay mortgages or grow crops, and losses reached $25 million per day by 1936 (equivalent to $450,000,000 in 2018).[0] I can hardly fathom the true cost of something that impacts the entire planet.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_Bowl

Re: We Have Four Years to Save Ourselves from Climate Change, Harvard Scientist Says

#10
Does "no more permanent ice" means there is a period of the year where there is no ice at all at the poles? That seems hardly believable.

I was also under the impression that melting ice would push the level of the oceans by multiple meters. If 75-80% of ice has already melted, wouldn't we have seen significant elevation already?

Just some facts that I found surprising, coming from someone who doesn't know much on the topic. I'm well on board with global warming, but the facts presented here don't mesh with what I understood about it.

Post reply on HN