RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
1–10 of 141 posts
Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#2Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#3Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#4Allow me to save some time, from TFA:
> Is there a CVE number?
> Yes, see CVE-2019-0174 [1].
[1] https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2019-0174
---
> What is RAMBleed?
> Previous attacks exploited the Rowhammer effect to write (or flip) bits in the victim's memory. RAMBleed is different in that it uses Rowhammer for reading data stored inside the computer's physical memory. As the physical memory is shared among all process in the system, this puts all processes at risk.
> What data can be read by RAMBleed?
> While the end-to-end attack we demonstrated read out OpenSSH 7.9's RSA key, RAMBleed can potentially read any data stored in memory. In practice, what can be read depends on the victim program's memory access patterns.
> What technologies are affected by RAMBleed?
> RAMBleed relies on Rowhammer-induced bit flips to read privileged memory. As such, any system that uses Rowhammer-susceptible DIMMs is vulnerable. Previous research has demonstrated bit flips on both DDR3 and DDR4 with TRR (targeted row refresh) enabled. While we demonstrated our attack on a desktop machine and an ECC enabled server machine, Rowhammer attacks have been demonstrated against both mobile devices and laptops. As such, we suspect that many classes of computers are susceptible to RAMBleed.
> How can I mitigate this issue?
> Users can mitigate their risk by upgrading their memory to DDR4 with targeted row refresh (TRR) enabled. While Rowhammer-induced bit flips have been demonstrated on TRR, it is harder to accomplish in practice.
> Memory manufacturers can help mitigate this issue by more rigorously testing for faulty DIMMs. Furthermore, publicly documenting vendor specific TRR implementations will facilitate a stronger development process as security researchers probe such implementations for weaknesses.
Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#5Why does every new attack have a homepage these days?
Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#6Why does every new attack have a homepage these days?
Then thought about it and was expecting to see a comment saying “it’s so that normal people understand the vulnerabilities.”
And then I realized it’s probably also because of a desire to be seen. (It seems all participants are from academia?)
Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#7Why does every new attack have a homepage these days?
Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#8Why does every new attack have a homepage these days?
Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#9Re: RAMBleed Attack – Reading Bits in Memory Without Accessing Them
#10For those who don't understand: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feng_shui