Live data from Hacker News

The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

blog.webb.page

11–20 of 39 posts

Re: The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

#11

Is my scrollwheel broken? Oh, no, somebody just abused Javascript events for a horizontal scroll.

The scrolling is so horrible on this page. Only way I can move forward (right) is by scrolling up and one full swipe on my track pad moves it ~200 pixels.

Re: The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

#12
My long term bet: computing will move towards an interface driven by "emoji as command". Custom iconography will fade out as the interoperability (and familiarity) of popular unicode symbols becomes dominant. So much of the existing textual input we use is designed to overcome the limitations of our software. In the future if you want to go home then you'll ⌂. If you want to go to the supermarket then you'll U+1F6D2. Once the AI knows your usual supermarket then that's where it will bring you. A complete shorthand for interpersonal communication will spring up, obviating the need to express the kind of nuance that we use presently solely to delude ourselves that we have something to say that can't be statistically derived from the total sum of former human communication.

Meanwhile I'll be in my sweet, sweet grave.

Edit: looks like HN can't show the shopping trolley

Re: The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

#14
post #12

My long term bet: computing will move towards an interface driven by "emoji as command". Custom iconography will fade out as the interoperability (and familiarity) of popular unicode symbols becomes dominant. So much of the existing textual input we use is designed to overcome the limitations of our software. In the future if you want to go home then you'll ⌂. If you want to go to the supermarket then you'll U+1F6D2.…

In the 80s a pundit predicted that in the future the interface to spreadsheets would be a games controller, because that's what the kids were growing up with and would want to use when they grew up. Then 10 years ago it was txt shrt abrvs wr t ftr. Except actually they were just the product of now ridiculously dated numeric keypad input the kids of today know nothing about.

The latest kids craze is always the wave of the future, except actually it's usually just a craze and will end up looking just as dated as the Rubik's Cube.

Re: The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

#15

Is my scrollwheel broken? Oh, no, somebody just abused Javascript events for a horizontal scroll.

The scrolling is so horrible on this page. Only way I can move forward (right) is by scrolling up and one full swipe on my track pad moves it ~200 pixels.

I had the same experience, but I found that the arrow keys worked fairly well for moving side-to-side. The presence of a workaround still doesn't make this kind of thing acceptable though.

Re: The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

#17

Is my scrollwheel broken? Oh, no, somebody just abused Javascript events for a horizontal scroll.

I think this is a sign of stagnating development on the frontend. You have all these zealous developers trying to just do something new, better, different - eventually it leads to consuming itself, to the point where old, widely accepted standards are broken in the name of novelty, with no concern for the UX.

The same self-consumption can also be seen in the cryptocurrency space.

Re: The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

#18
post #6
post #2

What's with the bizarre horizontal scrolling?

I actually like it. Constraining the text width improves readability, columns make more efficient use of the available space, and horizontal scrolling avoids the need for vertical pagination when using columns.

It's a neat idea, but the execution is not there.

Re: The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The scrolling is so horrible on this page. Only way I can move forward (right) is by scrolling up and one full swipe on my track pad moves it ~200 pixels.

I had the same experience, but I found that the arrow keys worked fairly well for moving side-to-side. The presence of a workaround still doesn't make this kind of thing acceptable though.

I’m a fan of multi-column layouts horizontal scrolling but this one is badly done. The scrolling speed is wrong; might be calibrated for the author’s pointer device, because they vary a lot, both among devices and among operative systems. There is no way to get it right.

The mapping of vertical scroll to horizontal scroll is something that should be done by the browser when using a multi-column layout.

My most recent attempt is this: https://sentido-labs.com/en/library/201904240732/Xanadu%20Hy...

Right after the title there is a checkbox, checked by default, that when unchecked will lay the document out with multi-column chapters and horizontal scroll inside a chapter, vertical scroll to move between chapters.

I use a touchpad which allows horizontal scrolling so there is no need to remap v-scroll to h-scroll, but that would not work with most mice that only have a plain scroll wheel.

In practice, I too find the cursor keys (also try page-up/-down) the most comfortable way. It’s still jankier than it should but I hope that browsers’ handling of CSS scroll snap points will improve.

Although the multi-column layout works well for me, it does not for most people because of limitations in both the browser and their input devices, so I had to make single-column the default.

Re: The Future of the Operating System: Revisited, Part 1

#20
post #12

My long term bet: computing will move towards an interface driven by "emoji as command". Custom iconography will fade out as the interoperability (and familiarity) of popular unicode symbols becomes dominant. So much of the existing textual input we use is designed to overcome the limitations of our software. In the future if you want to go home then you'll ⌂. If you want to go to the supermarket then you'll U+1F6D2.…

I can say "home" or "supermarket" faster than I can type Unicode. For that matter, I can type "home" or "supermarket" faster than I can type Unicode.
Post reply on HN