Live data from Hacker News

Blender Is Free Software

code.blender.org

51–60 of 335 posts

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#51
post #37
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you say free software, you have to clarify, 'free as in freedom, not as in beer', libre doesn't have that double meaning.

Libre doesn't have a meaning at all, in English, so you'll have to explain that as well. In other languages that I know there is no such problem because the two meanings of "free" are clearly disambiguated by two different words.

I don't have my OED to hand to check, I'd be surprised if it wasn't in there though. I had come across the word prior to my introduction to free software, I'd come across gratis also.

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

free and gratis difference but English has two versions of free ie free and gratis..Libre is gratis

Are you sure? It's the opposite in latin.

Gratis as in without any associated cost and fri (free) as in without restrictions is the usage in Swedish as well.

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#53
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the other hand freedom is a really nice word that everyone loves whereas "libre" is some fake French or something that you have to try to pronounce with some kind of rolled r like is that really going to succeed in the American marketplace of ideas

It isn’t fake. Libre is a real french word that means “free to do [something]” or “free from [something],” along with a few other meanings. I do think the pronunciation issue is going to hamper its adoption, though. If it’s pronounced as it is in French, it’s very similar to how we say the zodiac sign “libra,” but if you don’t know it’s french, it could easily be Spanish/Italian/Latin and be pronounced “leebray.” The…

In fact, it is also a Spanish word, roughly pronounced "leebray" (in Italian and Latin it's different, though).

In fact, just learned now that it's supposed to be loaned from French, I had always assumed it to be from Spanish (I'm biased because I'm Spanish).

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#54
post #18

I try to say libre software rather than Free Software , and I wish the FSF would back the libre term fully. When RMS is giving a speech, he has an opportunity to expound on what's now wordplay about "free software", to a captive audience that's perhaps already receptive or prepared to listen. But low-level grassroots advocacy opportunities often happen in contexts in which people are talking for some other purpose, a…

I'm a soon-to-be third year CS student. If I started to use the term "libre software" I'd be ridiculed to hell and back. I think you overestimate the receptiveness of developers.

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#55
post #23
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Somebody recently launched a new site "Blender Depot" which hosts a bunch of Blender add-ons and provides a batch install feature. Some of the add-ons on this site are commercial plugins available for sale by their authors. All Blender plugins have to be GPL so this sort of redistribution is legal but some of these authors have been rather upset about it. So a large argument ensued on the Blender forums about the GPL…

I think the referenced forum discussions are [0][1] for anyone else trying to find them? [0] https://blenderartists.org/t/introducing-blender-depot-brows... [1] https://blenderartists.org/t/yet-another-discussion-about-th...

Thank you for providing the context.

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#56
post #30
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Somebody recently launched a new site "Blender Depot" which hosts a bunch of Blender add-ons and provides a batch install feature. Some of the add-ons on this site are commercial plugins available for sale by their authors. All Blender plugins have to be GPL so this sort of redistribution is legal but some of these authors have been rather upset about it. So a large argument ensued on the Blender forums about the GPL…

I don't think using an API of a GPL software means your software "has to be" GPL. For example, not all software running on Linux using Linux APIs (syscalls) is GPL.

I think if it did mean that, Linux would be abandoned by most major companies overnight, as you could not develop non-GPL binaries for it; I do however believe Blender is in the wrong here.

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#57
post #26

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Wtf

When you say free software, you have to clarify, 'free as in freedom, not as in beer', libre doesn't have that double meaning.

Offtopic, but I've been wondering where people are getting all this free beer from? Where I come from beer is quite expensive.

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#58
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He explicitly says so in the comments section: "Blender add-ons (Python scripts using the Blender API) have to be GPL license compatible. You pay for the service to download it, not for the software. Never feel bad about harming any GPL developer by sharing her/his code. Sharing is an act of love!"

Paraphrasing from another comment, you know that the post is unclear when you have to explain it in the comments section.

I think most discussions about the GPL have this feature.

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#59
post #18

I try to say libre software rather than Free Software , and I wish the FSF would back the libre term fully. When RMS is giving a speech, he has an opportunity to expound on what's now wordplay about "free software", to a captive audience that's perhaps already receptive or prepared to listen. But low-level grassroots advocacy opportunities often happen in contexts in which people are talking for some other purpose, a…

I'm a soon-to-be third year CS student. If I started to use the term "libre software" I'd be ridiculed to hell and back. I think you overestimate the receptiveness of developers.

How often do you use the term "free software" in the FSF sense?

Re: Blender Is Free Software

#60
post #18

I try to say libre software rather than Free Software , and I wish the FSF would back the libre term fully. When RMS is giving a speech, he has an opportunity to expound on what's now wordplay about "free software", to a captive audience that's perhaps already receptive or prepared to listen. But low-level grassroots advocacy opportunities often happen in contexts in which people are talking for some other purpose, a…

To me free software means, it is free to get and free to modify.

Why so complicated?

Post reply on HN