Live data from Hacker News

Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

techcrunch.com

201–210 of 345 posts

Re: Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

#201
post #107

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, there’s obvious benefits for FB. What are the benefits for users? Are people actually going to want to use this?

For users, the advantage would be an easy to use stable-coin, that is more accessible to the average person. Right now, most crypto currency has plenty of complexity to it. FacebookCoin will probably work more similarly to CashApp vs. Bitcoin. It means most people using it won't even realize it's a Blockchain token. It'll be like "Facebook Bucks". But then it also offers the flexibility of a blockchain token to more…

[deleted]

Re: Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

#203
post #18

A few points: - some pegged currencies are still decentralised (e.g. MakerDAO) - they rely solely on smart contracts - even with a centralised peg, you have to trust an organisation to keep the collateral, but the contract can state that anyone can move the funds around, so the managing organisation cannot just remove funds at will Also, compared to a centralised database, you have an interoperability aspect - if it'…

MakerDAO is not decentralised, simply because the ETH/USD price feed isn't decentralised. If the servers providing the feed get hacked, say goodbye to your ETH collateral.

They might integrate with ChainLink, a decentralized oracle network: https://chain.link

Re: Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

#204
A cryptocurrency that violates one of the main tenants of cryptocurrencies. The fact is doesn't require a centralized authority. This is basically Twitch bits and shouldn't be classified as a cryptocurrency. As others have stated, probably the only reason to use one is because an existing blockchain can simply be used under a new brand.

Re: Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

#205
post #193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Do you think it's as easy for those in India, China, or Kenya, for instance? Actually yes. Take a look at xoom.com and it's competitors for example (flat rate money transfers at a fraction of swift fees). Only issue is getting money out of those countries. But that is a political and national issue.

And how about Venezuela? Or for people without a bank account?

Are people actually using BTC in Venezuela, or do they just claim to be from Venezuela, and are asking for donations into their wallet?

> Or for people without a bank account?

I'm having strong doubts that you actually understand how the world banks. There are hundreds of millions of people who don't have bank accounts, and use electronic payments through their cell providers.

Re: Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

#206
post #25

The most logical thing for Facebook would be to create something similar to the Chinese payment systems Alipay and WeChat Pay, bound directly to your Facebook account and maybe even issuing credit to some accounts. Completely different from a pseudonymous cash-like cryptocurrency like Bitcoin or Tether.

Those are single-market, single-currency products no? Facebook wants one coin to serve all it's 2.4bn users - a larger user base than USD I might add.

Re: Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

#207
post #6

Can anyone explain what the point of a pegged cryptocurrency is? Since you are dependent on the issuing entity to honour the stated peg, why not just have your balance be an entry in a regular database maintained by that entity? What exactly does the blockchain gain you here? One thing it does _not_ get you is censorship resistance. If the central authority wants to take away coins from a wallet, all it needs to do i…

>Can anyone explain what the point of a pegged cryptocurrency is? What was the point of arcades taking your quarters and issuing you tokens for the machines? Why not just allow the machines to take your quarters? The idea is for the issuer to take real money from you and issue you Monopoly money which the issuer can track and control. In a worst case scenario the issuer can make up new rules (change their terms and c…

The point of arcade tokens is to prevent people breaking in to machines, feeding them slugs instead of coins, and reduce the number of employees with access to unlimited free quarters.

Re: Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

#209

I will revisit this thread in 2021 just to see how wrong everyone was. FB has billions of users that interact with its product everyday. People who make plans, attend events, split all sort of bills. A borderless stablecoin will be a gamechanger. It can fuel commerce but above that it will kill many middlemen and rightly so.

A payments system on Facebook makes a ton of sense and would be very useful. I just don't get why it has to be cryptocurrency.

Don’t forget that Facebook is extremely capable of reading the public. It could be a marketing tool designed to capture early adaptors.

Re: Facebook plans cryptocurrency debut

#210
post #23

Facebook's blockchain will most likely be a consortium of corporate validators. In this case you could say that the blockchain is "just" a normal distributed append-only hash-linked ledger with public verifiable records, but nowadays the more concise term for that is "blockchain."

Your definition is missing the "block" from blockchain and it's also missing a concensus protocol.

Well obviously a distributed database needs a consensus protocol.
Post reply on HN