Live data from Hacker News

Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

arc.io

41–50 of 65 posts

Re: Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

#41
This is neat and all, but their widget.js file is 888KB.

For comparison, Bootstrap is 180KB, Elm is 29KB and Vue.js is 100KB.

It might not be much for sites otherwise dealing with large multimedia assets, but for anyone going for lean / fast web development, this seems to be a no-go.

Re: Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

#42
post #4

The pricing link doesn't work on my iPhone/mobile safari. Now the site is down...which makes me think this cdn doesn't work so well. I currently pay ~500/mo for a cdn so I am a real potential customer.

There's also BunnyCDN, which is $0.01/GB - https://bunnycdn.com/

Re: Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

#43
post #23

So... Hetzner bandwidth is $0.00112/GB, almost 18x cheaper than arc.io ( https://wiki.hetzner.de/index.php/Traffic/en ) And Hetzner is a no-nonsense real company that's been around since 1997. Hetzner machines have dedicated 1Gbps connections. Arc.io promises nothing. Arc.io is a faceless company with no track record, no history, and doesn't say how long they've been around. Who would you choose?

What would our technological landscape look like currently if everyone was hostile against new companies? Old doesn't mean good.

New does not mean good either.

Re: Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

#44
post #31
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

More importantly the performance of Arc.io website is dreadful. If you're going to sell high-performance then you should at least make your own website perform well. If your website performs well then I'm more likely to believe your story.

If you think performance problems mean a bad CDN, you're probably not the target audience.

I really don't understand this comment - who is the target audience of a CDN product if not those that want to increase performance for local users?

Re: Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

#45

This is neat and all, but their widget.js file is 888KB. For comparison, Bootstrap is 180KB, Elm is 29KB and Vue.js is 100KB. It might not be much for sites otherwise dealing with large multimedia assets, but for anyone going for lean / fast web development, this seems to be a no-go.

Their widget includes vue … for a button with a pop-over.

Re: Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

#47
post #4

The pricing link doesn't work on my iPhone/mobile safari. Now the site is down...which makes me think this cdn doesn't work so well. I currently pay ~500/mo for a cdn so I am a real potential customer.

$500/month is quite a lot. Are you hosting videos? Or some high traffic image site?

f2p game with like 2k new users per day.

Re: Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

#48
post #42
post #4

The pricing link doesn't work on my iPhone/mobile safari. Now the site is down...which makes me think this cdn doesn't work so well. I currently pay ~500/mo for a cdn so I am a real potential customer.

There's also BunnyCDN, which is $0.01/GB - https://bunnycdn.com/

That is better than what we are doing with cdn77 25 tb tier. I am going to look into switching.

Re: Arc.io – A Crowdfunded Distributed CDN

#49
post #4

The pricing link doesn't work on my iPhone/mobile safari. Now the site is down...which makes me think this cdn doesn't work so well. I currently pay ~500/mo for a cdn so I am a real potential customer.

Content from https://arc.io/pricing : CDN Bandwidth $0.02 per GB Egress (worldwide) (76% cheaper than AWS1) Usage is billed monthly, on the first day of each calendar month. Additionally, only peer-to-peer egress bandwidth is billed; all peer-to-peer ingress bandwidth is free. For example, if a 100kB image is loaded from Arc's peer-to-peer network, only 100kB of bandwidth is billed, not 200kB (100kB of egress + 100kB…

So this is unreliable, potentially slow, and more expensive than bunnyCDN?

That makes no sense and this whole idea sounds like a pitch I would see for an ICO.

Post reply on HN