Live data from Hacker News

Apple Sign In

techcrunch.com

41–50 of 544 posts

Re: Apple Sign In

#41
post #3

Disposable, anonymous email forwarding is a massive step forward for privacy. I know we've all been doing it for a while, but this on a consumer level is fantastic.

I wonder how many poorly designed database schemas this will break that used email as a primary key/id.

Why would this break any databases? Accounts will still have valid emails. The difference is just that there won't be data for that email in third-party tracking databases, which is a good thing.

Re: Apple Sign In

#42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, you're clearly correct. But Apple pushing this does give it a sense of legitimacy and blocking signups from this service might just cause less signups than actually forcing people to use their real address. If Apple makes this extremely user friendly and quick to use than blocking it will cause a loss of signups.

Devils advocate: ‘Error: We love Apple and anonymity but we require a real email address to prevent fraud and to properly secure your account. Please enter your real email address.’

Then you get kicked out of the App Store.

(potentially)

Re: Apple Sign In

#43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, you're clearly correct. But Apple pushing this does give it a sense of legitimacy and blocking signups from this service might just cause less signups than actually forcing people to use their real address. If Apple makes this extremely user friendly and quick to use than blocking it will cause a loss of signups.

Devils advocate: ‘Error: We love Apple and anonymity but we require a real email address to prevent fraud and to properly secure your account. Please enter your real email address.’

This sounds like a way to get your app rejected for abusing APIs.

Re: Apple Sign In

#45

Can’t services just disallow/block this address? Fun thing is, Apple themselves block name+addon@gmail.com addresses when using their dev console. You can bet that some companies will disallow Apple’s signature private passwords similarly if they can, in the name of ‘security’ or what have you. Or am I being too cynical? Feel free to CMV. EDIT: best response addressing this seems to be ‘The addresses are only generat…

Sure, they really could. But for me, it could be a reason to pick Lyft over Uber for example. I hope they add support to the App Store description, that would really help filter apps.

Re: Apple Sign In

#46
This is the ultimate way to manage your incoming email - I’ll be filtering everything based on the `to:` address when this rolls out and my life will be wonderful again

Re: Apple Sign In

#47
post #35

What is forcing the sites that I'd want to use a fake email address with to use this? It wouldn't be in their interest to. They will just stick with their current SSO setup of Google/Facebook/whatever and never touch this, if they have SSO at all. I LOVE LOVE LOVE the idea, I just don't know if it will be useful and successful.

Nothing is forcing them to, and lots probably won't. The carrot is the much lower friction for sign up for users. It's similar to Apple Pay, where you don't get credit card info, but you do get a much easier user flow that will get you more signups.

Re: Apple Sign In

#48
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

They already offer Apple Pay on the web. I imagine the experience will be similar here.

True, although that would imply Sign in with Apple would be Safari-only, which might be a hard sell.

Might be a JavaScript API like MusicKitJS, since I don’t see this requiring hardware support.

Re: Apple Sign In

#49
So this is only for mac/iphone users? That's not a large enough segment to warrant adding a sign in option for most sites. Would be nice if Mozilla had done something similar with Persona.
Post reply on HN