Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
1–10 of 100 posts
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#2So, in at least a couple of cases, these events coincide with the deployment of new air defense tech with advanced information processing capabilities? One should at least consider the possibility that they are machine-generated artifacts, possibly responses to unusual conditions that have mundane explanations.
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#3So, in at least a couple of cases, these events coincide with the deployment of new air defense tech with advanced information processing capabilities? One should at least consider the possibility that they are machine-generated artifacts, possibly responses to unusual conditions that have mundane explanations.
Or its just aliens.
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#4At first I thought these were just glitches in complex military imaging and sensor software/hardware.
But then a more sane version of me took over and concluded that I’m looking at aliens in YouTube videos.
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#5Second Foundation
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#6So, in at least a couple of cases, these events coincide with the deployment of new air defense tech with advanced information processing capabilities? One should at least consider the possibility that they are machine-generated artifacts, possibly responses to unusual conditions that have mundane explanations.
Wasn't there optical and IR footage? Seems unlikely that many discrete systems would all have ghosting artifacts at the same time and location.
Or maybe I am mixing reports. I've read about several recently.
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#7So, in at least a couple of cases, these events coincide with the deployment of new air defense tech with advanced information processing capabilities? One should at least consider the possibility that they are machine-generated artifacts, possibly responses to unusual conditions that have mundane explanations.
Wasn't there optical and IR footage? Seems unlikely that many discrete systems would all have ghosting artifacts at the same time and location. Or maybe I am mixing reports. I've read about several recently.
Yeah, as I understand it there were visual sightings as well.
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#8So, the US was testing unknown and presumably expensive drone technology on Carrier Air Groups? Why would they do that in a "live" situation with people who would report it? I would think (and perhaps I'm wrong) that keeping advanced craft secret would be in the US interest.
I don't buy the ET explanation and I don't buy this one either.
If it is real and it is a craft it's much more likely it was a state actor testing us.
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#9So, in at least a couple of cases, these events coincide with the deployment of new air defense tech with advanced information processing capabilities? One should at least consider the possibility that they are machine-generated artifacts, possibly responses to unusual conditions that have mundane explanations.
>One should at least consider the possibility that they are machine-generated artifacts
I'll certainly consider that as a partial explanation, but IIRC some pilots made visual contact as well.
Re: Carrier Group in Recent UFO Encounters Had New Air Defense Tech
#10Well this level of sensor capability would be an ideal real world means of testing the latest stealth, aircraft, and detection, technologies all at once.
It also reveals just how blind even the best equipped ships are and that you need to be able to integrate so many resources at once to have real security.