Live data from Hacker News

Block Fingerprinting with Firefox

blog.mozilla.org

1–10 of 411 posts

Re: Block Fingerprinting with Firefox

#4
post #3

As always when it comes to Firefox and privacy, the question is why isn't it on by default?

Because it may cause some websites to break and they're aiming to provide a good user-experience for the majority of the population. If they turn this on by default without users knowing the risks of sites not working correctly, they'll unfairly blame Firefox, bad mouth it, and switch to Chrome/Edge/Safari/etc.

Re: Block Fingerprinting with Firefox

#5
post #3

As always when it comes to Firefox and privacy, the question is why isn't it on by default?

Because it may cause some websites to break and they're aiming to provide a good user-experience for the majority of the population. If they turn this on by default without users knowing the risks of sites not working correctly, they'll unfairly blame Firefox, bad mouth it, and switch to Chrome/Edge/Safari/etc.

That's the stated reason but it's pretty weak to me. Safari hasn't had to make similar compromises.

Re: Block Fingerprinting with Firefox

#6
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it may cause some websites to break and they're aiming to provide a good user-experience for the majority of the population. If they turn this on by default without users knowing the risks of sites not working correctly, they'll unfairly blame Firefox, bad mouth it, and switch to Chrome/Edge/Safari/etc.

That's the stated reason but it's pretty weak to me. Safari hasn't had to make similar compromises.

[deleted]

Re: Block Fingerprinting with Firefox

#8
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Because it may cause some websites to break and they're aiming to provide a good user-experience for the majority of the population. If they turn this on by default without users knowing the risks of sites not working correctly, they'll unfairly blame Firefox, bad mouth it, and switch to Chrome/Edge/Safari/etc.

That's the stated reason but it's pretty weak to me. Safari hasn't had to make similar compromises.

[deleted]

Re: Block Fingerprinting with Firefox

#10
Yes, the same browser that sent the raw browsing history of a portion of users to a third party. Talk about tracking!

>Users who receive a version of Firefox with Cliqz will have their browsing activity sent to Cliqz servers, including the URLs of pages they visit.

https://blog.mozilla.org/press-uk/2017/10/06/testing-cliqz-i...

Post reply on HN