I don't see anything on camera, GPS, maps, push, etc. Was this implemented?
Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
11–20 of 134 posts
Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#12It looked very promising but GPL for mobile iOS and Android Apps It is impossible, even I release the Apps free it is very difficult to work with GPL on those ecosystems. It is sad because it really looks very cool code.
> Finally, there will be a commercial licensing option for everyone who cannot or does not want to comply with the GPL.
Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#13I don't see anything on camera, GPS, maps, push, etc. Was this implemented?
Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#14I don't see anything on camera, GPS, maps, push, etc. Was this implemented?
Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#15Edit: not to mention no support for text areas, will be interested to see that abstraction :)
Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#16This is awesome but man the licensing sucks.. Sounds like to release on the App Store you have to pay for a commercial license? Even a free app?
Yes. GPL apps can't go into the app store, because it's terms of use forbid activities that can't be forbidden according to GPL.
What am I missing?
Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#17Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#18Awesome! Does anyone know if there is any similar framework for RUST?
Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#19It looked very promising but GPL for mobile iOS and Android Apps It is impossible, even I release the Apps free it is very difficult to work with GPL on those ecosystems. It is sad because it really looks very cool code.
From the FAQ: > Finally, there will be a commercial licensing option for everyone who cannot or does not want to comply with the GPL.
Re: Boden – Native mobile cross-platform applications
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes. GPL apps can't go into the app store, because it's terms of use forbid activities that can't be forbidden according to GPL.
I don't quite understand this. The GPL gives the end user the rights to the source, to modify the source and to redistribute the software (modified or otherwise), as long as they make the source available. It doesn't say it has to be available through the exact same mechanism that you received the software in the first place, nor does it say that you have to release your changed software through the same mechanism. I…