Live data from Hacker News

AdNauseam: Browser extension to fight back against tracking by ad networks

github.com

41–50 of 69 posts

Re: AdNauseam: Browser extension to fight back against tracking by ad networks

#41
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you want to use it in Chrome you have to jump through hoops. Why would a potential AdNauseam user even use Chrome?

Multiple and fully isolated user profiles - hugely important for the work I do. I know Firefox has containers, but they're not really feature complete compared to Chrome's, and the UI experience leaves a lot to be desired, there's just to many friction points. edit: forgot to also mention, I'm also aware FF has profiles as well (about:profiles) but the implementation has too many speedbumps. As I mentioned in another…

Vivaldi also has profiles, added recently! (Uses Chromium)

Re: AdNauseam: Browser extension to fight back against tracking by ad networks

#42
post #28
post #15

Apart from actual malware, this is the only browser extension I know of to have been blacklisted by Google. If you want to use it in Chrome you have to jump through hoops. For the record, I approve of AdNauseam. I have every right to browse the internet how I choose. My computer, my control. I am firmly against the corporization of the internet.

> If you want to use it in Chrome you have to jump through hoops. Why would a potential AdNauseam user even use Chrome?

Chrome is (or was) good. Safari is fast, but is a bit clunky and doesn’t have many extensions, and Firefox has never felt like a proper macOS app. Maybe it’s better on Windows where platform standards are less strict.

Re: AdNauseam: Browser extension to fight back against tracking by ad networks

#45
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you want to use it in Chrome you have to jump through hoops. Why would a potential AdNauseam user even use Chrome?

Multiple and fully isolated user profiles - hugely important for the work I do. I know Firefox has containers, but they're not really feature complete compared to Chrome's, and the UI experience leaves a lot to be desired, there's just to many friction points. edit: forgot to also mention, I'm also aware FF has profiles as well (about:profiles) but the implementation has too many speedbumps. As I mentioned in another…

Firefox has profiles too, although they are probably even even harder to use than containers.

Re: AdNauseam: Browser extension to fight back against tracking by ad networks

#46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Multiple and fully isolated user profiles - hugely important for the work I do. I know Firefox has containers, but they're not really feature complete compared to Chrome's, and the UI experience leaves a lot to be desired, there's just to many friction points. edit: forgot to also mention, I'm also aware FF has profiles as well (about:profiles) but the implementation has too many speedbumps. As I mentioned in another…

Vivaldi also has profiles, added recently! (Uses Chromium)

Thanks, I'll take it for a drive. My big concern about third party browsers built on Chromium is knowing if they're up-to-date with their security fixes. Also there's that lack of openness about all the stuff they're building on top of Chromium, which is maybe a bit rich seeing as I rely on Chrome :).

Re: AdNauseam: Browser extension to fight back against tracking by ad networks

#48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Multiple and fully isolated user profiles - hugely important for the work I do. I know Firefox has containers, but they're not really feature complete compared to Chrome's, and the UI experience leaves a lot to be desired, there's just to many friction points. edit: forgot to also mention, I'm also aware FF has profiles as well (about:profiles) but the implementation has too many speedbumps. As I mentioned in another…

Firefox has profiles too, although they are probably even even harder to use than containers.

Yeah, I forgot to add to my comment something about their Profile implementation which feels like another half baked idea.

Re: AdNauseam: Browser extension to fight back against tracking by ad networks

#49
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If you want to use it in Chrome you have to jump through hoops. Why would a potential AdNauseam user even use Chrome?

Multiple and fully isolated user profiles - hugely important for the work I do. I know Firefox has containers, but they're not really feature complete compared to Chrome's, and the UI experience leaves a lot to be desired, there's just to many friction points. edit: forgot to also mention, I'm also aware FF has profiles as well (about:profiles) but the implementation has too many speedbumps. As I mentioned in another…

You can also start firefox with a -p flag to get a profile selector on startup.

Re: AdNauseam: Browser extension to fight back against tracking by ad networks

#50

Not sure why simply blocking the ads isn't a better signal than trying to send mixed messages that they can just filter out. Ad blocking already is fighting back, is more environmentally friendly, and doesn't expose you to anything.

> trying to send mixed messages that they can just filter out.

How does this work? Remove clicks from people that click many ads? Doubtful!

It is noteworthy that Google doesn't bitch too much about AdBlocking in the past, but lost their shit at AdDauseam![1]

https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/01/05/adnauseam_expelled_...

Post reply on HN