11–20 of 171 posts
Not to a CIA "load station" ? https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
It doesn't make sense to be anything other than an error and Huawei being paranoid (rightfully so, but still).
I wonder what the backstory is to this. You don't issue a press release for two missing packages. And since they were "important commercial documents" I am assuming that US intelligence must have intercepted them for some reason.
Sure, it’s highly suspicious that a Hauwei shipment end up in America but equally it seems unlikely FedEx would be dumb enough to advertise that fact on their tracking page if they were ordered to divert said documents.
I’m not suggesting there isn’t something deeper going on that governments are keeping classified, however if there is then they’re doing a good job of keeping it a secret by making this trade war sound like petty bickering.
Not to a CIA "load station" ? https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
They were documents. Why wouldn't they have just intercepted them in-place instead of sending them to the US? It doesn't make sense to be anything other than an error and Huawei being paranoid (rightfully so, but still).
Not to a CIA "load station" ? https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/05/photos-of-an-nsa...
They were documents. Why wouldn't they have just intercepted them in-place instead of sending them to the US? It doesn't make sense to be anything other than an error and Huawei being paranoid (rightfully so, but still).
Scout's honor. Sounds a lot like Huawei saying it was just a coding error. Would they get away of a spying accusation with this? If it can happen in the US (FedEx, Cisco) it can surely happen in China.
It's strange seeing people defending this as "probably an error" and perfectly acceptable when coming from one side but definitely intentional and totally unacceptable from the other.
The hypocrisy is strong in this one...
P.S. For the casual observer, please note that this comment is not about which company is guilty and how (un)acceptable that may be.
Or US intelligence requested the documents be diverted. Either is about equally likely I'd say.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They were documents. Why wouldn't they have just intercepted them in-place instead of sending them to the US? It doesn't make sense to be anything other than an error and Huawei being paranoid (rightfully so, but still).
They just want you to think they were documents. The question is why ...
(I genuinely can't tell if this is a joke or not)
Earlier quoted context omitted.
They just want you to think they were documents. The question is why ...
Are you now implying that Huawei is lying about them being documents to cover up what they were actually shipping or something? (I genuinely can't tell if this is a joke or not)
To me, it appears as a Chinese way of saying they are are as much at the mercy of US logistics as the Western World is at the mercy of Huawei's logistics ( 5G ).
edit: even it when it is not true, the message comes across.
If this had been a us govt request they wouldn’t have scanned the packages at the sorting facilities in the US!