Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
nytimes.com
Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
1–10 of 236 posts
Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#2Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#3Why can't Nancy Pelosi sue facebook for $100 billion for allowing a doctored video about her to spread? They can't use the Napster defense of "we're only a platform."
Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#4Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#5Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#6I wonder if it would have taken FB that long to demote the video if it had depicted Sandberg or Zuckerberg slinging racial slurs.
Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#7I wonder if it would have taken FB that long to demote the video if it had depicted Sandberg or Zuckerberg slinging racial slurs.
Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#8Why can't Nancy Pelosi sue facebook for $100 billion for allowing a doctored video about her to spread? They can't use the Napster defense of "we're only a platform."
Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#9Interesting that a journalist thinks that Facebook is optimized for what "looks good" rather than what drives eyeballs. Facebook is just giving the people what they want. (To say nothing of how self-congratulatory that sentence is)
Re: Nancy Pelosi and Fakebook Dirty Tricks
#10Why can't Nancy Pelosi sue facebook for $100 billion for allowing a doctored video about her to spread? They can't use the Napster defense of "we're only a platform."
$1.5 million reasons why she doesn't sue: https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/totals.php?id=D000033563&cy...
$16,450 to her in particular for those interested