Live data from Hacker News

Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

crossfit.com

11–20 of 164 posts

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#11
post #5
post #2

[dead]

What is wrong with a` low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet.`? That doesn't really seem like pseudoscience in the realm of anti-vaccine and grapefruit diet BS. It's a valid diet.

But eventually you end up writing paranoid conspiracy stuff on the Internet from the lack of glucose going to your brain.

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#12
Interesting, because there's no way crossfit the brand gets where it is today without FB and IG and it's millions of believers posting #crossfit #blessed #pump #cross #fit #getsum #etcetc. Having said that, maybe it's trying to avoid the masses of troll hashtags much like mine above....

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#13

Wow I had heard Crossfit was a bit of an obsession for some people and a quirky approach to fitness, but I had no idea their official spiel was this level of paranoia - attacking academia as an unholy alliance of the establishment? > The voluntary CrossFit community of 15,000 affiliates and millions of individual adherents stands steadfastly and often alone against an unholy alliance of academia, government, and mult…

This article is in a section called "battles", which is one of the five main headings on their website. That says a lot about how they see themselves.

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#14

This is actually a big deal. CrossFit, whether you like it or not (I’m not a fan) is at this point a major consumer brand. Not too long ago it would have been unthinkable for a brand this significant to make this kind of move.

It should be unthinkable. Do we really want social issues litigated by major brands slinging mud at each other? Imagine Pepsi publishing the equivalent article about how Comcast is evil.

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#15
post #7

Wow I had heard Crossfit was a bit of an obsession for some people and a quirky approach to fitness, but I had no idea their official spiel was this level of paranoia - attacking academia as an unholy alliance of the establishment? > The voluntary CrossFit community of 15,000 affiliates and millions of individual adherents stands steadfastly and often alone against an unholy alliance of academia, government, and mult…

If you've ever been an athlete, and have spent 30 seconds watching crossfit - it becomes obvious the goal is to see how dumb of an "exercise" you can do before getting hurt. There are two type of crossfitters - those who have gotten a permanent and serious injury, and those who are going to get one.

Always wondered how one of my friends is uninjured from CrossFit doing it 3 times a week for 10 yrs.

I am guessing he doesn't push himself to the limit.

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#16
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you've ever been an athlete, and have spent 30 seconds watching crossfit - it becomes obvious the goal is to see how dumb of an "exercise" you can do before getting hurt. There are two type of crossfitters - those who have gotten a permanent and serious injury, and those who are going to get one.

Always wondered how one of my friends is uninjured from CrossFit doing it 3 times a week for 10 yrs. I am guessing he doesn't push himself to the limit.

Supposedly there are (rare) good CrossFit trainers who keep their class safe.

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#17

This is actually a big deal. CrossFit, whether you like it or not (I’m not a fan) is at this point a major consumer brand. Not too long ago it would have been unthinkable for a brand this significant to make this kind of move.

It should be unthinkable. Do we really want social issues litigated by major brands slinging mud at each other? Imagine Pepsi publishing the equivalent article about how Comcast is evil.

> Do we really want social issues litigated by major brands slinging mud at each other?

I agree the mud slinging in this post is pretty ridiculous, but I certainly like it when major brands refuse to do business with other brands that are harmful to society. For example, those that chose not to advertise on Fox News.

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#18
post #5
post #2

[dead]

What is wrong with a` low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet.`? That doesn't really seem like pseudoscience in the realm of anti-vaccine and grapefruit diet BS. It's a valid diet.

CrossFit is not just a diet regimen.

Re: Crossfit Inc. suspends use of Facebook and associated properties

#20
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It should be unthinkable. Do we really want social issues litigated by major brands slinging mud at each other? Imagine Pepsi publishing the equivalent article about how Comcast is evil.

> Do we really want social issues litigated by major brands slinging mud at each other? I agree the mud slinging in this post is pretty ridiculous, but I certainly like it when major brands refuse to do business with other brands that are harmful to society. For example, those that chose not to advertise on Fox News.

And, since you mentioned Fox News, look at the last tweet's date on https://twitter.com/foxnews.

Boycotts have a long, storied history.

Post reply on HN