I was working on a personal project recently which involved importing lots of Japanese names into a database for my app. I had originally made a "person" table with columns for "given_name" and "family_name" – but ended up going with a combined "name" column because I couldn't find a reliable way to determine if data from different sources was using the given-first or family-first convention (and I was automatically…
Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
161–170 of 262 posts
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#162In terms of Chinese names, my observation is that in English media, if your name is printed as "first_name last_name" then you haven't made it yet. But if you are somebody, your name will appear as "last_name first_name". E.g. Xi Jinping, Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping. When was the last time you heard "Ming Yao the former Rockets center"?
Jack Ma seems like a counter example.
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
The convention of calling a person by just their last name has no bearing on their name order. Obama is still Barack Obama, not Obama Barack. If Russians don't say Vladimir, that doesn't make his name Putin Vladimir. The only Western nation that has a different naming scheme is Hungary, which uses the Japanese-like family-name-first scheme.
> The only Western nation that has a different naming scheme is Hungary There are other countries in the West with different naming schemes than the one common in the Anglosphere, even if they happen to still have the given names first and some combination of family names thereafter; I've several times seen US outlets butcher the names of Mexican officials because they assume that the same name order applies when the…
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#164English should adopt the French convention of capitalizing the family (last) name. For example, this would make it ABE Shinzo, which would remove ambiguity. When encountering East (thanks for the reminder) Asian (or Hungarian, for that matter) names in emails for example, I'm usually worried about if their "last" name in the directory is their given name and what they should be addressed by or their actual last name.
Yes, this works well in writing and it is common practice in Eastern Asia. However, how about oral conversation? Sometimes, I am not sure what is the proper way to introduce my Chinese name in English conversations? If I put family name at first, it would confuse English speakers. If I put given name first, the sound of my name feels so weird to me as that is not what I heard outside English environments.
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#165I was working on a personal project recently which involved importing lots of Japanese names into a database for my app. I had originally made a "person" table with columns for "given_name" and "family_name" – but ended up going with a combined "name" column because I couldn't find a reliable way to determine if data from different sources was using the given-first or family-first convention (and I was automatically…
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#166Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The only Western nation that has a different naming scheme is Hungary There are other countries in the West with different naming schemes than the one common in the Anglosphere, even if they happen to still have the given names first and some combination of family names thereafter; I've several times seen US outlets butcher the names of Mexican officials because they assume that the same name order applies when the…
That has nothing to do with name ordering. This discussion is about name order. I didn't think I had to spell that out considering the article is about name ordering. I should've been more specific.
It has exactly to do with name ordering, since the source of the issue is that the nearest equivalent of the English last name is actually the penultimate rather than final element of the name in the order at issue.
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
> the romanized names could be ambiguous as to what is the first name; for example: 江劉鋒 JIANG Liufeng (where both Jiang and Liu could be potential Chinese surnames) On the other hand, it'd be pretty hard for the surname to occur in the middle of the name, where you have the 刘.
「劉」is being used as part of a first name in this case.
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#168What I find interesting is that there are exceptions to the current practice in English. Yoko Taro (family name: Yoko) is known widely as Yoko Taro, yet most other Japanese game developers are known as GivenName FamilyName (in English). [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoko_Taro
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mi pensis, ke ni havas unu.
On en a plusieurs. Et c'est l'opinion d'un vilain qui est ici citée. (I suggest we get back to english for the sake of the rest of the conversation since this exchange between us served its purpose of being insightful with a bit fun thrown in)
Re: Foreign Minister Taro Kono to ask media to switch order of Japanese names
#170I was working on a personal project recently which involved importing lots of Japanese names into a database for my app. I had originally made a "person" table with columns for "given_name" and "family_name" – but ended up going with a combined "name" column because I couldn't find a reliable way to determine if data from different sources was using the given-first or family-first convention (and I was automatically…
Whenever I'm on a team building something new, I've fought hard to stop people from splitting names into first/last. There's simply no right way to do it. In addition to conventions like family name first in Japan, Spanish naming conventions create confusion (First Paternal_Family Maternal_Family), and there are rare outliers like mononyms as well. There is almost no use case--aside from perhaps a genealogy site--whe…
[0]https://www.w3.org/International/questions/qa-personal-names