Earlier quoted context omitted.
This "losing the popular vote" narrative would be a lot more compelling (at least to me) if the elections were less close. It looks bad to win the Presidency and lose the popular vote, but I don't think it actually matters. In a nation of 300 something million, close enough to half want either candidate. The problems lie elsewhere. (The fact that I can say "either candidate" is part of it.) [Edit: I should have said…
So many problems with this. 1. 300 million people are not registered voters. ~50-60 million are. 2. First Past The Post means people are voting for the candidate they hate the least, not the candidate they prefer. 3. The election wasn't very close. 2 million votes more for 1 of the candidates in 2016. 4. The electoral college "matters" in that without it, the Iraq war wouldn't have happened, nor Trump. Saying it's th…
The 2016 popular vote total was over 130 million [0]; registration appears to have been somewhere between 157 million and 191 million. [1]
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidentia...
[1] https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/cps/tables/p20/580/...