U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
1–10 of 120 posts
Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#2Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#3Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#4Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#5Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#6More FUD. Nuclear energy is the safest energy.
Unclear why you believe nuclear energy (by which I assume you mean nuclear power generation) is relevant.
Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#7Paywalled so I cant read but that dome in cover something with a porous bottom and rising sea level isn't helping either. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=autMHvj3exA
Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#8Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#9Re: U.S. put nuclear waste under a dome on a Pacific island. Now it’s cracking open
#10More FUD. Nuclear energy is the safest energy.
On the other hand, given the wrong incentives, you might just stow nuclear waste where it's cheapest and where you can get away with it, and then not be penalized when the containment mechanism you cheaped out on fails... or maybe you just conveniently forget to do maintenance on it as the responsibility for doing maintenance somehow conveniently evaporates due to some bureaucracy.
I think the debate isn't over whether or not nuclear power itself is safe, it's the debate over whether or not humans under capitalism are to be trusted to behave responsibly with this technology. Nuclear power isn't just the technology in isolation... humans are an intrinsic part of it.