Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not for cultured saplings. A plant growing in the forest is a resource, a carefully bred strain cultured over hundreds or thousands of years is nationalized IP.
> a carefully bred strain cultured over hundreds or thousands of years is nationalized IP Is that just your opinion, or is there an internationally accepted legal framework around that? Could you perhaps post a link where I might learn more?
A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
81–90 of 169 posts
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not for cultured saplings. A plant growing in the forest is a resource, a carefully bred strain cultured over hundreds or thousands of years is nationalized IP.
> a carefully bred strain cultured over hundreds or thousands of years is nationalized IP Is that just your opinion, or is there an internationally accepted legal framework around that? Could you perhaps post a link where I might learn more?
[1] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smuggling_of_silkworm_eggs_i...
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#83Can plants be used to clean pollutants from the atmosphere in a space station? Maybe not: https://www.gardenmyths.com/garden-myth-born-plants-dont-pur... https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/03/indoor-p...
It seems like as a rough approximation your plants would need to grow at least as much biomass as you eat every day.
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#84I just don't think there is enough evidence to believe his story.
Gardening is one of the many areas of life where the best information and the bulk of information is offline.
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#85I just don't think there is enough evidence to believe his story.
The point on HN seems to be; the takeaway, arguing grammar/numbers/journalistic standard, and cooler-topics recently, and this has all 3. (Hyperbolic comments too, in case the /s is not autodetected by the content-bot mentality)
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#86Seen this before. Simplest answer: don't believe it. That cork in the top looks new. And very, very removable. And if you still want to believe it, without evidence, then I have some property in Florida to sell you.
The real reason this one is newsworthy is because nobody knocked it off the table and shattered it in 50 years.
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
You might be interested in Biosphere 2 [1], a 3 acre hermetically sealed dome stucture designed to house about 8 people with an ecosystem to provide them with everything they need to survive. They didn't quite get oxygen and food production to the required level, but if you add another acre or so it should work. With renewed interest in moon and mars colonies somebody is bound to revive that line of research. 1: http…
The first experiment was hampered by them not realising the cement needed CO2 to cure, to be honest I would have halted the experiment to find out what the issue was then restarted it. Although they might not have realised this at the time, but then they weren't really testing a proper closed system. It would have been useful if they were able to test a closed system without the cement sucking up the CO2.
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, so fast-growing lettuce, kale, herbs, radishes, carrots, peas, and green onions would be the order of the day.
Or a fast growing edible fungus. Space Quorn!
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#89I just don't think there is enough evidence to believe his story.
Re: A Sealed Garden That Was Watered Once in 53 Years (2017)
#90I wonder if part of what makes it work is luck of the draw wrt. the microbial life that was present at the start. You need stuff that will break down the dead plants at a good enough rate but nothing that competes for resources or produces anything toxic to the plant. Or maybe that's a typical microbial makeup for sample of gardener's compost?