Google 2010 Zeitgeist • Hacker News Board

Re: Google 2010 Zeitgeist

#31

Post by bourdine » Fri, Dec 10, 2010, 10:32 PM UTC

snth wrote: post #15

pbhjpbhj wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I'm surprised not to see porn represented on this page at all. I'm surprised that you're surprised. You expect Google, in what amounts to a press release, to direct people to pornography sites?

So you're assuming Google is editing out the porn sites. I was assuming porn sites legitimately didn't make the page, and I was surprised by that.

maybe, is it time for creating pornoogle.com?

Re: Google 2010 Zeitgeist

#32

Post by Vidura » Sat, Dec 11, 2010, 5:27 AM UTC

Using which tool was the video made ? Can it me made with Google's Cloud tool ?

Re: Google 2010 Zeitgeist

#33

Post by isleyaardvark » Mon, Dec 13, 2010, 2:39 PM UTC

snth wrote: post #15

pbhjpbhj wrote: post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>I'm surprised not to see porn represented on this page at all. I'm surprised that you're surprised. You expect Google, in what amounts to a press release, to direct people to pornography sites?

So you're assuming Google is editing out the porn sites. I was assuming porn sites legitimately didn't make the page, and I was surprised by that.

I could see porn sites not legitimately making that page. First of all the categories are nearly all "Fastest Rising", you can easily imagine porn queries being less volatile. Also, despite porn's popularity, there are basically no porn stars famous enough to pull the same number of queries as a Katy Perry or a Shakira.