Earlier quoted context omitted.
>google is a bigger concern for privacy and personal liberty Big claim. Any proofs? With Facebook, what annoyed me was that they set up internal teams to help with political candidates social media campaigns - no matter who the candidates are. Extremely worrisome if you prefer to have people elected through a democratic process that is based on the discussion. This is not like understanding what people want or how do…
Has Google ever disclosed exactly what data they collect, what they do with it, who can look at it, etc? We "know" that Google takes privacy "seriously", but that is a faith based position.
And I can't vouch for all of Google, but regarding location data, Google has been pretty transparent regarding which data is collected and stored; papers like NYT covered it extensively - see [1].
And Google also gives you clear ways to delete this data, as referenced in that NYT article [2].
And moreover, Google has been consistently on track to store less private data. Example: location data is going to be auto-deleted for users that want that, as of this month[3]. Maps now gets an incognito mode[4].
>but that is a faith based position.
Hope the links I referenced will help dispel this notion. Google does take privacy seriously.
(Disclaimer: I work for Google. The opinions expressed here are mine and not of my employer; etc - what I said is public knowledge.).
[0]https://policies.google.com/technologies/retention?hl=en-US
[1]https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/13/technology/google-sensorv...
[2]https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/3118687?hl=en
[3]https://mashable.com/article/google-auto-delete-location-his...
[4]https://www.theverge.com/2019/5/7/18535657/google-incognito-...