Live data from Hacker News

RealTalk Speech Synthesis

medium.com

1–10 of 23 posts

Re: RealTalk Speech Synthesis

#3
Hot damn, as someone who has listened to a few JRE episodes, it is... quite good. What really struck me was its ability to recreate words that were (I'm guessing) weren't said by him in the past. Impressive!

Re: RealTalk Speech Synthesis

#4

  Because of this, at this time we will not be releasing our research, model or datasets publicly.
Has OpenAI's handling of GPT-2 inadvertently provided political cover for commercial organizations who would love to claim they engage with the ML research community but would actually prefer to contribute nothing other than medium articles?

Re: RealTalk Speech Synthesis

#5
Impressive (really), but it raises a more philosophical question (as in practical ethics): do we really want voice-bots to blend in perfectly, or should they better feature distinctive marks (like a rather monotonous personality)?

[Edit: This is not so much about DeepFakes, as discussed in the article, but more about a general level of implementation.]

Re: RealTalk Speech Synthesis

#8
There's a telltale discontinuity in the rise of the voice on the word "chimps" in the sentence "and these chimps have been working out hard". I wonder if future generations of kids will have to be trained to spot such things.

Re: RealTalk Speech Synthesis

#9
post #5

Impressive (really), but it raises a more philosophical question (as in practical ethics): do we really want voice-bots to blend in perfectly, or should they better feature distinctive marks (like a rather monotonous personality)? [Edit: This is not so much about DeepFakes, as discussed in the article, but more about a general level of implementation.]

If perfect imitations are outlawed, only outlaws will have perfect imitations.

I’m not sure how useful that question is. If it can be done then it will be, and we’ll have to deal with it whether we want it or not.

Re: RealTalk Speech Synthesis

#10
Remember in Fahrenheit 451 where Guy Montag's partner is glued to the Wall? A screen where she participates in her favorite shows and the audience and cast members talk directly to her?

Read in a modern context I don't think Guy was merely burning books in service to an authoritarian government. I think he kept the books because he was becoming an outsider. He didn't want to participate in the world of the Wall and consent to the expectations and norms of his society. And the firemen were there to ensure everyone participated.

Post reply on HN