Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's great, but would be a contravention this new law apparently. The law doesn't want to know how much you bill or how much is allocated, but how much you actually work. I the context of labour, surely it makes sense, but there, most hours are logged. Outside of that it gets a little harder.
It's fully on the employer if they log more time than you actually worked, the issue that was addressed with this ruling was people who'd clock out and then continue to work or where there is no clock and people simply write down how long they worked. The issue the court had was that if you write it down then there is the possibility that you worked overtime but didn't actually write that or your employer changed it.…
No, this ruling cannot prevent this practice at all. How could it, without a government official standing watch?