Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use my voice controls for 3 big reasons daily: 1) Timers (laundry, cooking, etc) 2) Music 3) Smart home stuff On the 3rd one, voice actually made the smart home easier. To use a smart light bulb you had to unlock your phone, open an app, login, and do your thing. Now I tell my Alexa/Google to do it and it's super easy. Also the chromecast integration on Google Home is killer "OK google play pandora on TV" or "Play…
I only use my voice controls once a day. When I come home, Siri automatically turns on my lights. When I go to bed, I shout "Hey, Siri, turn off the lights." (10% of the time she responds with, "OK, your six a-m alarm is off." I don't know why.)
Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
71–80 of 99 posts
Re: Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because it does upload everything you say to the cloud, and saves it for undisclosed amount of time, and has the ability to link those recordings to your account and the motivation to exploit it for business purposes? Not to mention possible data breaches in case that data is not perfectly secured.
> Because it does upload everything you say to the cloud What evidence do you have of this?
They're not supposed to upload "everything" you say, only the stuff you say after the wake phrase. The issue is that they're known to wake up and start recording when they're not supposed to, because they're not perfect about recognizing the wake phrase. There's also the fact that they have to be _listening_ all of the time in order to hear the wake phrase, and the security fear is that, due to a bug or malicious software, they could end up recording and uploading everything they hear as well. That's not a problem of the stated intent of the device, it's a problem of the latent capabilities being used improperly. The best way to secure the device is to remove those capabilities.
Re: Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
#73Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Because it does upload everything you say to the cloud What evidence do you have of this?
That's a necessary component of how it works: these devices don't do the speech recognition locally. They upload it to their cloud and run it through their machine learning network. They're not supposed to upload "everything" you say, only the stuff you say after the wake phrase. The issue is that they're known to wake up and start recording when they're not supposed to, because they're not perfect about recognizing…
"You could hypothetically be giving up all your privacy if there are bugs, and in some cases there are known bugs causing you to give up a limited amount of privacy" is a very different level of threat from "you are giving up all your privacy to Amazon who will use it for ad targeting".
I'm willing to accept the former, in return for the amount of convenience I get from the device.
However, others in this thread are arguing that nobody should accept the latter, which is irrelevant because it's not the real situation.
Re: Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
#74ZDNet's article https://www.zdnet.com/article/amazon-cant-yet-completely-del...
Re: Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
I was referring, in a convolute way, to the fact that all the data collected have been/will be used to train the models that will allow offline voice recognition (like the one google has shown at i/o last week).
I might be mistaken, but the reason we don't see offline recognition (amongst other things) is hardware limitations, not the lack of training data. The small onboard chip doesn't have that much compute power, so they offload to more powerful Amazon/Google servers that can run the inference.
I think that this is an important point. Obviously there's more computing power available in Apple/Google/whoever's data centres than on my device, and I'm sure that is, or at least was, a concern; but I also don't believe that they are indifferent to the utility of sitting on such a huge volume of user-submitted, real-world data.
Re: Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
#76In the EU this is a violation of GDPR if true.
Re: Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
#77Why people are acting surprised about this? To me it has been always more than obvious that whatever you say to any of the internet connected “assistants” will be stored and kept as long as the assistant owning company likes.
Re: Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
#78This is why we are building 100% offline and private-by-design Voice AI at https://snips.ai , it is free for makers and works in english, french, german, japanese, spanish, italian, and more coming!
Re: Amazon can't yet completely delete Alexa voice transcriptions
#79In the EU this is a violation of GDPR if true.
Not sure why you're being downvoted. Is it not a GDPR violation?