Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
61–70 of 143 posts
Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#62Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#63> Obviously with log parsing you don’t get as much information as a JavaScript-heavy, Google Analytics-style system. There’s no screen sizes, no time-on-page metrics, etc. But that’s okay for me! This also bypasses Ad blocker. In the case you have a large percentage of technical audience (who presumably would have Ad blocker installed) this log can be way more accurate than GA. However this still requires setting up…
GA does a good job at extrapolating your data to account for users with ad block. Obviously not perfect, but good enough for most cases.
Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#64If you’re not a fan of big brother you probably should be logging to bare metal instead of Amazon S3.
https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/data-privacy-faq/ "We do not access or use your content for any purpose without your consent. We never use your content or derive information from it for marketing or advertising"
Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#65Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#66Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#67If you take the trouble to host everyting on a stack you actually control, raw server logs and GoAccess is a highly capable and for most cases sufficient monitoring tool. I use othing but.
Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#68making your own beacon based tracking system is pretty simple, and then you have the screen sizes, time on page metrics etc.
The real power of Google Analytics is not in the tracking code, it's with the front-end interface that any non-technical product manager or marketer can use. Tracking users is easy. Allowing non-technical folks with easy-to-use analysis tools is much harder.
Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#69> Obviously with log parsing you don’t get as much information as a JavaScript-heavy, Google Analytics-style system. There’s no screen sizes, no time-on-page metrics, etc. But that’s okay for me! This also bypasses Ad blocker. In the case you have a large percentage of technical audience (who presumably would have Ad blocker installed) this log can be way more accurate than GA. However this still requires setting up…
> This also bypasses Ad blocker GA does a good job at extrapolating your data to account for users with ad block. Obviously not perfect, but good enough for most cases.
Re: Show HN: I replaced Google Analytics with simple log-based analytics
#70> Obviously with log parsing you don’t get as much information as a JavaScript-heavy, Google Analytics-style system. There’s no screen sizes, no time-on-page metrics, etc. But that’s okay for me! This also bypasses Ad blocker. In the case you have a large percentage of technical audience (who presumably would have Ad blocker installed) this log can be way more accurate than GA. However this still requires setting up…
> This also bypasses Ad blocker GA does a good job at extrapolating your data to account for users with ad block. Obviously not perfect, but good enough for most cases.