11–20 of 108 posts
Gnome and KDE seem so close in polish these days, it's hard to decide which one to run and I keep on going back and forward.
personally I find gnome's filesselector unusable, whereas kde's is great.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
personally I find gnome's filesselector unusable, whereas kde's is great.
Last I tried, you couldn't type direct paths into the fileselector or the file browser, basically requiring that you mouse your way around. I found that extremely aggravating and went back to KDE almost immediately.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
personally I find gnome's filesselector unusable, whereas kde's is great.
Last I tried, you couldn't type direct paths into the fileselector or the file browser, basically requiring that you mouse your way around. I found that extremely aggravating and went back to KDE almost immediately.
I can't be the only one that dislikes KDE's typography. I see that notification pane and aside from color, nothing gives it typographical hierarchy. It just looks odd to me.
I can't be the only one that dislikes KDE's typography. I see that notification pane and aside from color, nothing gives it typographical hierarchy. It just looks odd to me.
I can't be the only one that dislikes KDE's typography. I see that notification pane and aside from color, nothing gives it typographical hierarchy. It just looks odd to me.
KDE UI never gets Typography, spacing/padding, or alignment correct.
It's a shame because they are so close on most other criteria.
Gnome and KDE seem so close in polish these days, it's hard to decide which one to run and I keep on going back and forward.
It depends on if you like features and configuration options or not. If you don't like features and don't want to be able to set any configuration options, go for Gnome. Otherwise, KDE.
I can't be the only one that dislikes KDE's typography. I see that notification pane and aside from color, nothing gives it typographical hierarchy. It just looks odd to me.
All the UI and UX in general looks like it's from 2007. I know that it's volunteer work and I don't want to downplay the generosity of those who contributed to it, but I do wonder what's causing the delay in catching up to modern aesthetics. Is it a technical issue? Is there too much bureaucracy to overcome? Is there a shortage of UI and UX developers?