Live data from Hacker News

Blue Moon

blueorigin.com

11–20 of 236 posts

Re: Blue Moon

#11
post #5

Welp, then I am going to say it: it looks underwhelming, both in capability and looks. 6.5t of soft-landed payload to surface of moon and 2.5kW of power via fuel cells if Twitter can be trusted. A grand vision of O'Neill cylinders and whatever in space is nice but how? How? Less gradatim and more ferociter would be nice.

It looks like a step in the right direction to me. What's your baseline here?

Re: Blue Moon

#12
post #7

If this is a lander what will they use to deliver the lander to lunar orbit? I'll admit I don't follow this sort of news very closely, but it seems quite exciting.

[deleted]

Re: Blue Moon

#13
I'm confused. Does this actually exist yet?

The linked page says things like "Blue Moon is a flexible lander", and "Blue Moon can land multiple metric tons of payload on the lunar surface". Is there any actual hardware? Or is it entirely CAD drawings and renderings? They seem to be implying that the hardware currently exists and is ready to go (presumably for the Pence/Trump 2024 mandate), but the videos and pictures don't seem consistent with that.

Edit: I found a bit more info elsewhere [1]. They built a nice nonfunctional model of it. It sounds like it's relatively early in development, let alone integration. They'll start testing the engines in the next few months. This sort of hyperbolic marketing copy that abuses verb tenses and grammar is a huge pet peeve of mine.

[1]: https://spacenews.com/blue-origin-unveils-lunar-lander/

Re: Blue Moon

#14

I'm confused. Does this actually exist yet? The linked page says things like "Blue Moon is a flexible lander", and "Blue Moon can land multiple metric tons of payload on the lunar surface". Is there any actual hardware? Or is it entirely CAD drawings and renderings? They seem to be implying that the hardware currently exists and is ready to go (presumably for the Pence/Trump 2024 mandate), but the videos and pictures…

No it does not exist yet. This is a page devoted to pulling both private and public funding and something to wave in front of Congresscritters' eyes.

Re: Blue Moon

#15
Astronauts train for years before going to space. Do these space tourism companies pretend that anyone with enough cash can do it?

Re: Blue Moon

#16
post #7

If this is a lander what will they use to deliver the lander to lunar orbit? I'll admit I don't follow this sort of news very closely, but it seems quite exciting.

Presumably their New Glenn rocket

Re: Blue Moon

#17
post #8

I'll take soft-serve over a soft landing any day: https://www.atlasobscura.com/foods/blue-moon-ice-cream-midwe...

That was also my initial thought. It's hard finding it in California but found one place (Rick's Ice Cream in Palo Alto) that sells it in the bay area.

Re: Blue Moon

#18
post #7

If this is a lander what will they use to deliver the lander to lunar orbit? I'll admit I don't follow this sort of news very closely, but it seems quite exciting.

They'll launch this paper lander on their paper rocket (New Glenn). Nothing exciting here because there's no hardware being built yet.

Re: Blue Moon

#20
post #2

I was waiting for this announcement. It is unclear to me how "real" this is; Bezo's claims they can meet the timeline of people on the moon in 2024. Since they aren't flying a heavy booster like the Delta IV heavy or the Falcon Heavy yet, and those platforms took about 10 years to go from concept to first flight. Bezos is suggesting he can do that in 5 years. Perhaps he's considering using the Delta for FHeavy as the…

Supposedly, New Glenn will be ready in 2021. I wouldn't be surprised if this requires New Glenn's bigass fairing— I don't think anyone is currently flying anything with the same size capabilities (although neither is Blue Origin, at the moment)
Post reply on HN