Earlier quoted context omitted.
The role of education (and parenting) is to teach the child how to sort information they obtain from sources like those googled results. Why did he believe in those biased sources of info? How come he didn't have the skills to determine what is fact and what is opinion stated as fact?
Is this a rhetorical question? A lot of (most?) adults aren't immune to this sort of manipulation, let alone kids. See: Fox News, cults in general, and so on. It's not just about bad information, or opinion stated as fact, or whatever. Whether it is designed to indoctrinate and radicalize, or whether it "simply" evolved that way as a meme (in the Dawkins sense, probably clumsily applied), that's how it works. These p…
It sounds like a joke, but this content is purposefully created and disseminated for the purpose of "going viral," so that it can spread itself. It's created by people who either have only consumed like content and want to spread their virus ("my personal opinion based on internet reasearch is that...") or people who actually create this stuff on purpose to push the agenda of their employ.
The Dawkins meme analogy is brilliant, we just hadn't really seen it used as a weapon until pretty recently.