Live data from Hacker News

Google Fights Back

stratechery.com

11–20 of 475 posts

Re: Google Fights Back

#11

Google should fight back at last years promisses. Where is the feature of calling people automatically on google assistant? Last year they promised they would call my hair saloon for me, and it's all BS. Like everything they say every year, it never works in real life. But I see lots of "journalists" praising it, while criticizing Siri as useless. Where is their self driving car too? Never complete, they always promi…

[deleted]

Re: Google Fights Back

#12
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Where is the feature of calling people automatically on google assistant? https://www.androidauthority.com/what-is-google-duplex-86947...

It simply doesn't work, at all. Prove that it does work. Because it just doesn't exist at all. You pointed to an Android fanboy's site. It's not the reality: https://mashable.com/article/google-io-2018-report-card-dupl... This is to put it lightly....

I have been using the call screening feature on my Original Pixel for months now. It works very well. I can't comment on making reservations via phone, since we don't often go to places that require reservations, but the call screening is great.

Re: Google Fights Back

#13
I'm impressed with the direction Google is taking, and how they've pivoted in the face of public awareness of privacy concerns.

I like the Google products and services that I use. There are some that I miss (Reader) and some that just confuse me (Bookmarks), but the core works for me.

Based on commentary I've seen, I may be the only person on Hacker News to think so. Regardless, I'm hopeful for the future.

Re: Google Fights Back

#14
Privacy is going to be the most valuable commodity of the 21st century.

Google is doing everything in its power to buy/take/borrow that commodity from people (just like FB. Amazon, MS, etc...) They can say things like "We are moving from a company that helps you find answers to a company that helps you get things done…We want our products to work harder for you in the context of your job, your home, and your life, and they all share a single goal: to be helpful, so we can be there for you in moments big and small over the course of your day. "

But I don't buy it.

Re: Google Fights Back

#15

Google should fight back at last years promisses. Where is the feature of calling people automatically on google assistant? Last year they promised they would call my hair saloon for me, and it's all BS. Like everything they say every year, it never works in real life. But I see lots of "journalists" praising it, while criticizing Siri as useless. Where is their self driving car too? Never complete, they always promi…

I suspect you're also crying about still not having the jetpack we were promised in the 50s.

Vision is imprecise.

Re: Google Fights Back

#16
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>> Where is their self driving car too? Waymo is not a car company. They don't have the capability to make an actual car even if the autonomy stuff worked well enough to be used nationwide. Which it does not and will not in the foreseeable future.

They promised that we all be driving in self driving cars in 2017. And they announced they partnered with FIAT Chrysler automotive. Google simply doesn't have it. Google sells this BS to journalists, and they sell it to Wall Street. That's only why Google is worth $817B.

You seem fixated on the word "promise," which I've never once heard said.

Assistant calling and Duplex appointment booking were both available within the year, across most of the United States, but you claim neither work.

Re: Google Fights Back

#17
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Where is the feature of calling people automatically on google assistant? https://www.androidauthority.com/what-is-google-duplex-86947...

It simply doesn't work, at all. Prove that it does work. Because it just doesn't exist at all. You pointed to an Android fanboy's site. It's not the reality: https://mashable.com/article/google-io-2018-report-card-dupl... This is to put it lightly....

You've made this claim a few times in this thread now. Can you please elaborate as to what about Duplex, specifically, has not worked for you?

Edit: A quick browse through OP's comment history suggests that s/he might not be US-based. Should that be the case, then it's not that Duplex is flawed, it's that it's simply not available where they live.

Re: Google Fights Back

#18
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Where is the feature of calling people automatically on google assistant? already available in 44 states, they’re bringing it to the web. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/techcrunch.com/2019/05/07/goo... > Where is their self driving car too? Never complete, they always promise "it's the next year". there’s zero rush when there’s a chance of killing people. also this: https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.theverge.com/p…

It simply doesn't work in any real life situation. Yes, the problem of self driving cars is they can kill people, that's the whole problem, thing is that google is always promising that "they are here for all", "it's the next year", etc. it's all BS. You don't have a google self driving car, and you didn't book your hairdresser via duplex, and you won't be booking your car or anything through any of this. Those are t…

duplex is available though, have you even tried using it ?

can you provide any basis for your "facts"

Siri being subpar when compared to Google Assistant is well established.

Re: Google Fights Back

#19
post #7

Google owns my soul. Their boxes know when I sleep, when I wake, how much I exercise, what I listen to, my innermost thoughts, my chats with loved ones, what I watched on Netflix last night, what my company does, the flu I have at the moment, what the hypochondriac in me looks up in the middle of the night, what I buy, whom I call, what I spend money on, where I spend it... I nominally pay for these services, but I s…

I love Google. I bought an Oppo phone. But all my data goes through their app - even when i switch off their SMS feature that data still goes through their app and i guess they intercept it and send it to a dial home server. And I'd rather my data goes to Google. So when I can afford a Google Pixel - gonna buy one

But anyone who thinks he's wrong - Remember into whose hands Java fell.

Re: Google Fights Back

#20
If Google's possession of all this data makes many new good things possible, then sharing this data broadly and freely with others would make even more good things possible. Would Google share the data with other corporations so that they, too, can innovate and serve the consumer even better?

I mean, if I buy into the notion of Google's benevolence, I should buy into that notion for other corporations, shouldn't I?

Post reply on HN