> You say that like "tech giants" are a good thing.
What you see is that - if the Czech Republic would have their own tech giants - they wouldn't propose such an aggressive taxation towards it. It's why Germany was against such taxes because they fear repercussions towards their own industry.
> But a predatory attitude focused only on their own growth and "to hell with everyone else".
Such a predatory attitude also gets punished through free market forces. A company like Microsoft got severely punished for their predatory behaviors.
One of my favorite tech giants is 'Robert Bosch Stiftung' from Germany.
> Aside from that there are plenty of European tech companies (ASML, Logitech, Skype, Spotify, just to name a few)
ASML is the meager remnant of the once almighty Philips. Logitech is Swiss. Switzerland indeed does a better job providing a healthy climate for innovation. Skype is owned by Microsoft. Spotify is indeed a lovely company (worth protecting for sure).
> Europe lacks such a powerful "hub".
This is indeed a problem. San Francisco provides an excellent climate that attracts innovation. An important factor was perhaps that there was so much room to grow. The right city at the right time. In Europe most of the land is already accounted or planned for something.
China got to grow so quickly exactly because the government decided to embrace free market forces.
> This is why the UK probably has more EU immigrants than many other countries
Many wealthy people migrated from France to the UK when Hollande proposed his tax plans.
https://www.businessinsider.com/small-business-owners-explai...
Now we see France giving all kinds of tax breaks to lure UK companies to France after Brexit.