Live data from Hacker News

Up to one million species are on the verge of extinction, U.N. panel says

washingtonpost.com

1–10 of 525 posts

Re: Up to one million species are on the verge of extinction, U.N. panel says

#4
Is a globalized, industrial economy is still considered “progress”? I haven’t seen the stars in over a decade. We’ve lost so much.

> We need to link it to human well-being, that’s the crucial thing. Otherwise we’re going to look like a bunch of tree-huggers

God forbid someone thinks you love nature.

Re: Up to one million species are on the verge of extinction, U.N. panel says

#6
post #5

[flagged]

Yeah, HN is over. For a number of reasons, but mostly a combination of shit moderation, laughable karma manipulation and heavy eternal september/bot influx.

Most of the voting is probably bots operating the ranking model. Most of the moderation is pretty ineffective begging and blunt rule twisting by sctb, dang, et al.

Re: Up to one million species are on the verge of extinction, U.N. panel says

#7

Is a globalized, industrial economy is still considered “progress”? I haven’t seen the stars in over a decade. We’ve lost so much. > We need to link it to human well-being, that’s the crucial thing. Otherwise we’re going to look like a bunch of tree-huggers God forbid someone thinks you love nature.

> I haven’t seen the stars in over a decade

I'm planning to get up in the wee hours tomorrow to check out the Eta Acquarids. We have a magnificent night sky on clear nights here, but there's always a creeping edge of sadness knowing half the world's human population is denied it, and that the cool starlight falls on a dying planet.

> God forbid someone thinks you love nature.

Yes wouldn't that be terrible. I wish though we could ditch the word 'nature' (as if there could be anything else). Similarly with 'the environment' (as if we had another home).

Re: Up to one million species are on the verge of extinction, U.N. panel says

#8

Is a globalized, industrial economy is still considered “progress”? I haven’t seen the stars in over a decade. We’ve lost so much. > We need to link it to human well-being, that’s the crucial thing. Otherwise we’re going to look like a bunch of tree-huggers God forbid someone thinks you love nature.

The biggest cause for environmental destruction and species loss is globalization, habitat destruction and consumption/production. The UN along with every major political and business international organization has been the pimps of globalization since ww2 ended. The idea that the UN cares about the environment is laughable to me since they want more globalization. The UN is run by the US, China, Russia, Britain and France ( the 5 permanent security council members ). It's an institution that cares about the environment as much as it cares about human rights. But I'm sure they'll use the environmental destruction they helped create to argue for more centralized control and power in the name of "human well-being".

Re: Up to one million species are on the verge of extinction, U.N. panel says

#10
post #5

[flagged]

From the FAQ page:

Are paywalls ok?

It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.

In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic.

Post reply on HN