Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is zero website, news team or otherwise that adheres to your nigh-impossible lofty ideals of 'neutrality'. Every single site is going to have some bias in one direction or another. For example, EFF is obviously going to be biased against anything that takes away privacy. The Guardian is going to be more left leaning than The Daily Mail and so forth. Can you name me a single example of a website behaving accordi…
> There is zero website, news team or otherwise that adheres to your nigh-impossible lofty ideals of 'neutrality'. Every single site is going to have some bias in one direction or another. I don't care for "some bias in one direction or another", nor I have "nigh-impossible lofty ideals". I just don't like to be taken for a fool with blatant bias -- which many outlets have, including the Guardian. > For example, EFF…
That said, again, what would be an example of a charitable news outlet that does not pull tricks you claim the Guardian is doing?