251–260 of 504 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Switch to what? Chrome? Because you don't like having to re-opt-in to studies? That would be ludicrous given Google's privacy track record. Opera? They're owned by a Chinese investment firm now. Edge? MS's whole OS is based on data collection.
Keep guessing.
hmm, i don't seem to have been affected by this bug somehow (my extensions are all still working). i turn off as much phoning home as i can (including turning studies off) and block connections to *.services.mozilla.com any idea why i might not be affected? it may help others who might want to retain control of their firefox browser (chromium-based browsers being non-sequiturs).
I turn on mostly all phone home functionality in Firefox, and also wasn't affected. Apparently the certificate check is only executed once every 24h, so I guess our checks only occurred after a fix was already pushed.
hmm, i don't seem to have been affected by this bug somehow (my extensions are all still working). i turn off as much phoning home as i can (including turning studies off) and block connections to *.services.mozilla.com any idea why i might not be affected? it may help others who might want to retain control of their firefox browser (chromium-based browsers being non-sequiturs).
It was the same for me. Firefox 66.0.3 on Xubuntu 19.04. I also turn off a lot of phone-home behaviour. And I never had any problems with extensions getting disabled. I have no idea why I wasn't affected. But frankly, "not being affected" isn't good enough for me. Even if I dodged this bullet I might not dodge the next. I'm looking for an alternative browser. Falkon has been interesting so far. It's a little bare-bon…
I personally don't think all this talk of "Bye-bye firefox" is quite fair (I'm referring to a number of comments on this page, not yours specifically). In my opinion (you may disagree), Mozilla is one of our best and strongest allies in the fight for a fair internet. Their values matter because they still have the user base to back them up. If all of us technical-minded folk jump ship to smaller, boutique browsers at every bug and gaffe, leading to a sort of browser balkanization, then Firefox loses its strength and those smaller browsers aren't impactful enough to be able to resist Chrome/Chromium.
But, maybe your choice of browser is purely utilitarian, and that's totally fine of course.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Switch to what? Chrome? Because you don't like having to re-opt-in to studies? That would be ludicrous given Google's privacy track record. Opera? They're owned by a Chinese investment firm now. Edge? MS's whole OS is based on data collection.
Keep guessing.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not putting words in your mouth, you literally said this is a "Good Thing (tm)", because of hypothetical security reasons. Whereas I'm literally saying that this actually broke real privacy extensions, broke peoples software, and badly damaged their reputation. As to your argument about security: doing the check on install instead of all the time, as I suggest is preferable, still protects against MITM and malwar…
Things might change after install. Its a Good Thing (tm) to periodically recheck, or check revocations. > > I'm not putting words in your mouth [..] Yes, you did: > "So you think [..]"
>> "So you think [..]"
Um, I ended that sentence with a question mark. Implying a question. But you conveniently left that out of your quote, so amusingly now you're putting words in my mouth. (Although who cares? I don't!) Maybe I should have phrased it "So do you think" but it would have essentially been the same sentence and typing on my ipad is annoying. I was asking you if you thought this was a good thing for Mozilla. Which you dodged to turn this into a debate about proper etiquette instead of answering the question directly. It was a leading question, sure, but I was making a point.
F you Mozilla. I lost all my tabs opened in other containers. The containers don't work too, so I cannot reopen them.
This bug has been known for 3 years, and you did nothing to fix it. You get so much money, and what you do is basically provide a pathetic software (thunderbird) and a nice browser (which you just stopped from working) and you show me banners asking for more money.
You should be ashamed. 3 years. And no, I'm not going to listen things like "this is open source, you are free to fix it". I will just go and switch to another browser. I need a browser which works, not a one which suddenly decides that my stuff should be broken because all the developers and managers have been ignoring a critical issue for a couple of years.
:( I know, this will be flagged, and removed. I don't care, I just need to get all my tabs in containers back. I have never thought that a browser can just close my tabs because a certificate expired.
Instead of enabling studies just click on this link. It installs that specific "study" (hotfix) without installing anything else. https://storage.googleapis.com/moz-fx-normandy-prod-addons/e...
I know Firefox isn't being malicious, but ugh, this seems like the worst possible PR move for this, optics wise. "Hey so uh, we accidentally broke your browser, so you need to opt-in to becoming a guinney pig. But don't worry! You probably were already opted in anyway and just didn't realize it! Also it might take six hours to work."
So that's pretty unfair. 1) They state they are working on a fix for normal, release channel users who don't want to run studies 2) they tell you to temporarily run studies to get the fix within up to 6 six hours (could be faster; set expectation) 3) You can explicitly install nightly or 66.4 before it's pushed if you want a fix now Yes, it's unfortunate, I'd expect them to meet it head on, push a tested fix in a tim…