Live data from Hacker News

Hackers went undetected in Citrix’s internal network for six months

techcrunch.com

1–10 of 122 posts

Re: Hackers went undetected in Citrix’s internal network for six months

#3
>Citrix said in a later update on April 4 that the attack was likely a result of password spraying, which attackers use to breach accounts by brute-forcing from a list of commonly used passwords that aren’t protected with two-factor authentication.

Wow. This simply reinforces the fact that humans cannot, and should not, be trusted with actively maintaining security of a system especially if there could be significant economic consequences.

Would a password manager help in this? I don't know.

Probably a hardware token which controls all and any access to a system.

*Removed some ambiguous sentences.

Re: Hackers went undetected in Citrix’s internal network for six months

#7
If you have anything of value, I absolutely guarantee you that there are hackers in your network right now.

One thing that frustrates me more than anything else is people assuming that their corporate network is safe. Your firewall and your vpc or whatever is a speed bump at best. You have to assume that you have an attacker on the desk right next to you, because you will eventually.

Re: Hackers went undetected in Citrix’s internal network for six months

#9
post #6

I fully assume there are more hacks we don’t hear about that ones we do. Not only because of cover ups but it can’t be that hard to cover your tracks if you know what you are doing.

Just assume they only catch the dumbest 20%.

Re: Hackers went undetected in Citrix’s internal network for six months

#10
post #3

>Citrix said in a later update on April 4 that the attack was likely a result of password spraying, which attackers use to breach accounts by brute-forcing from a list of commonly used passwords that aren’t protected with two-factor authentication. Wow. This simply reinforces the fact that humans cannot, and should not, be trusted with actively maintaining security of a system especially if there could be significant…

I was with you up until the last paragraph, but no. That's not 2fa, that's switching one factor for another.

People should use a password manager with an rng to generate and store passwords. IT departments should run password spraying attacks themselves as well as blacklisting known-compromised passwords. There's really good tooling for this (likely the same tooling this adversary used!)

Separately from this, people should use hardware 2fa tokens whose weakest link isn't the cell phone company support.

Edited for clarity.

Post reply on HN