21–30 of 97 posts
I'm not sure if this is just related to my machine, but I couldn't get it to compile. POST https://media.noise.fm/soul net::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID (this looks very cool and I want to try it out)
What browser and OS are you using?
I'm not sure if this is just related to my machine, but I couldn't get it to compile. POST https://media.noise.fm/soul net::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID (this looks very cool and I want to try it out)
They've built a Music Learning platform with Elm (afaik): https://learningmusic.ableton.com/
Elm wants to target WebAssembly, wouldn't it be able to compile to Soul too in theory?
How are the relationships with Ableton who are also in the Web Audio space and users of Juce? They've built a Music Learning platform with Elm (afaik): https://learningmusic.ableton.com/ Elm wants to target WebAssembly, wouldn't it be able to compile to Soul too in theory?
I'm not sure if this is just related to my machine, but I couldn't get it to compile. POST https://media.noise.fm/soul net::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID (this looks very cool and I want to try it out)
Try http. Also try Chrome; I think it doesn't work on my Firefox
Tried in FF as well and got CORS errors.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Please consider making dynamic graphs a key feature for the 1.0 release! I like how easy it is to use SOUL to build simple processes, but I'd like it a lot more if I didn't have to specify my graph at compile time. A few more questions: - How will the language/API/reference VM be licensed? - Will the API depend in any way on the JUCE ecosystem? - Do you expect users to bundle the VM with their plugins/applications or…
Not sure that being able to change the graph dynamically is a particularly good way to work with this kind of thing. In almost all synths, and even DAW engines, they only modify the graph when you modify the project, not while things are running, and that's when we expect you'd do a SOUL recompile. There's a much longer discussion to be had over this which I won't dive into now, but we have thought about many possibl…
RE the licensing, I'm asking more about the language itself, the IR, and whether it is going to be possible to develop independent implementations.
Lastly because I always forget to ask about the IR - why not WASM?
I hope there's some benefit to other domains that rely on real-time signal processing, like control systems. I would like to have something like this for robotics.
Yes, could be that it works really well for machine control, robotics, etc. Hopefully as it gets more established, people from those worlds will get involved and see what happens.