Live data from Hacker News

The Terrifying Potential of 5G

newyorker.com

71–76 of 76 posts

Re: The Terrifying Potential of 5G

#71

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I already disable LTE just to avoid Amber alerts. 3G is about 10% slower. Around here, they send all alerts out at the “incoming nuclear missile” level.

You should re enable it. Amber alerts are when a kid has been kidnapped and is probably going to raped or killed. You should do your part to watch for the perpetrator.

I still get them as a push notification through news sources.

The local track record has been pretty awful, including absurd lack of geo targeting, too late, referencing a tiny town that nobody has heard of, lack of useful timestamps (last seen at X, but when?), an early morning “end amber alert” alert and the “no charges, father picks up his son from school all the time, no further details will be released”. I think there have only been 5 alerts, 4 were in the above categories and the last still isn’t clear if the child was in danger.

Re: The Terrifying Potential of 5G

#72

If we should be concerned about the deployment of 5G, it's due to the fact that it will render our weather satellites nearly useless. The frequency they chose for 5G just so happens to be about the same frequency as water's resonance. 5G cell towers would show up as huge points of water concentration and we have no idea how to work around this yet. https://hackaday.com/2019/04/16/5g-buildout-likely-to-put-we...

The same is reported in the journal, Nature, which requested a comment from the FCC but didn't receive a reply. The Hackaday article contains this line: "FCC Chairman Ajit Pai rejected the request, stating that there was an “absence of any technical basis for the objection.” But the Washington Post really zeroes in on the FCC, reporting unresponsiveness to the NOAA, NASA, and even the House Appropriations Committee. All they're asking for is some time to study the situation, but the FCC won't delay spectrum auctions or even concede that there could be an issue.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-01305-4

https://www.washingtonpost.com/weather/2019/03/13/fcc-auctio...

Re: The Terrifying Potential of 5G

#74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I already disable LTE just to avoid Amber alerts. 3G is about 10% slower. Around here, they send all alerts out at the “incoming nuclear missile” level.

You should re enable it. Amber alerts are when a kid has been kidnapped and is probably going to raped or killed. You should do your part to watch for the perpetrator.

Probability of injury/death is one of the guideline criteria of the system but depending on where you live is not actually followed

Re: The Terrifying Potential of 5G

#75
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This is both irrelevant and wrong. It’s wrong because people do give a shit and these cities are trying to come up with a solution like limiting or completely banning certain pollutants like cars or burning coal etc. The air quality is constantly monitored since years and EU country’s have implemented quite strict environmental policies. It’s irrelevant because even if people didn’t given a shit about pollution , wou…

> EU country’s have implemented quite strict environmental policies. True, but yet, noone cares: - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/30/london-reach... - https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/12/london-h... - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44612642 You can point to the Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), which means you can't drive in to very central London (where most people work, b…

I don't get how do you reach the "No one cares" conclusion.

Re: The Terrifying Potential of 5G

#76
post #75

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> EU country’s have implemented quite strict environmental policies. True, but yet, noone cares: - https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/jan/30/london-reach... - https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/12/london-h... - https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-44612642 You can point to the Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), which means you can't drive in to very central London (where most people work, b…

I don't get how do you reach the "No one cares" conclusion.

I meant it has been happening since the EU-wide regulation came out. London reaches the critical yearly level at the first weeks of January and only cosmetic changes have been applied. E.g. a 20-year-old, rusty diesel truck, that makes ~£500/day gets away with £12.5 fee instead of ban from Greater London. The actual polluters won't invest in newer vehicles, because the lease is more expensive than just £12.5 per day.
Post reply on HN