I have such a hard time accepting that people can't just teach themselves things using free online resources. It's been shown in many studies that self directed learning doesn't work, but it worked for me. And I can't stand the idea of smart people paying thousands to learn things they could learn for free.
Lambda School wants to teach nursing
11–20 of 137 posts
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#12If only. We all know the majority of what we learned in school was not useful.
We should be striving to cut out the wasteful education that only serves as a signaling arms race https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/01/whats-c...
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#13> The firm devotes about a third of its time and resources to finding jobs for its graduates, an unusually high share. Another third goes to recruiting students and the rest to teaching. So, 2/3 of what they're paid (presumably after Austen Allred's and the VCs' take), is marketing, leaving the leftovers to pay for actual instructors. If I end up in the hospital, I want a nurse with an actual education, not "nursing…
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#14I'm torn on Lambda. On one hand, it seems far superior to traditional higher education, since the schools success depends on the success of the students. At the same time, profit sharing is a terrible financial decision. When compared with other bootcamps, it's basically a bet against yourself. You're willing to risk tens of thousands of dollars more money for some risk insurance. I have such a hard time accepting th…
Given that you could earn the entire cost of Lambda School (at the cap - the most expensive) in about three months of engineering time, it’s a rational decision even if you just speed up the process.
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#15This is ironic. My girlfriend, a nurse of 10+ years, got accepted to the Lambda School web dev track and is starting at the end of May, to get out of nursing.
So this is actually in line with where we want to be in the future.
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#16Lambda School has a 9 month program that takes a 17% cut of your salary for the first 24 months of employment with a cap at $30,000. Which many students in software will hit, especially in high COL areas.
It's worth noting that this is more expensive than many/most universities, which charge less than $30,000 per year (9 months of instruction) even at the sticker price (which no one actually pays).
In fact, I wonder whether bootcamps are even cheaper than the full cost of university. The average student loan debt upon graduation for all US university students is $29,400 (again, for four years of college education with access to both applied and fundamental courses across many different majors vs. a 9 month boot camp focused on a particular skill set).
To be concrete: by taking out a loan for what lambda school costs, you could double major in both nursing and CS at a state U for about the same amount of post-graduation debt as you would have at bootcamps. Or CS and Econ. Or CS and Accounting. Or CS and Mechanical Engineering. In states that still invest in higher ed, you'll end up paying less (even with interest) than you'd pay lambda school.
There's a natural experiment on this question at Purdue, where there's an apples-for-apples comparison and loans are almost always cheaper than the income sharing agreement.
To me, these income sharing agreements and bootcamps seem like not great deals when you look at instruction time per dollar. And also when you look at the longitudinal durability of the skill-set that's being taught. They have a place in the market for sure, but they aren't the panacea to expensive education. They're not even cost-competitive.
They're just a different point in the design space of educational programs that extract as much of the added value of their product as possible.
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#17I'm torn on Lambda. On one hand, it seems far superior to traditional higher education, since the schools success depends on the success of the students. At the same time, profit sharing is a terrible financial decision. When compared with other bootcamps, it's basically a bet against yourself. You're willing to risk tens of thousands of dollars more money for some risk insurance. I have such a hard time accepting th…
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#18I am skeptical that these income sharing agreements are so great. Especially in software. Lambda School has a 9 month program that takes a 17% cut of your salary for the first 24 months of employment with a cap at $30,000. Which many students in software will hit, especially in high COL areas. It's worth noting that this is more expensive than many/most universities, which charge less than $30,000 per year (9 months…
A student will have spent about 2,000 hours in Lambda School by graduation - the equivalent of ~4 university semesters, because we go all day every day and don’t take breaks.
And comparing the amount of debt vs the total possible cost doesn’t make for an accurate comparison either.
Also note that by the time a Lambda School student is at year four, if we want to factor in the opportunity cost of time, a Lambda School student has paid Lambda School back and has three years of earnings/work experience.
If you’re using time as the comparison: Would you rather have a degree and $24k in debt or three years of Lambda School, have paid the school off, and have earned an additional $250k?
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#19I'm torn on Lambda. On one hand, it seems far superior to traditional higher education, since the schools success depends on the success of the students. At the same time, profit sharing is a terrible financial decision. When compared with other bootcamps, it's basically a bet against yourself. You're willing to risk tens of thousands of dollars more money for some risk insurance. I have such a hard time accepting th…
For one, I think incentive alignment is extremely powerful. Austen Allred talks about it a bit here.[1] (Great interview). Although reducing risk for the students is a benefit, it seems that the effect it has on the quality of lambda's education is much more important. In fact I think that a good source of startup ideas is to simply find existing systems with misaligned incentives and then figure out how to align them--I'm planning to try something like that in the music industry myself.
Also, I don't think profit sharing is a terrible financial decision. You're not just paying to reduce risk: you're paying to get a better education. You could take a normal pay-up-front bootcamp and slap an income share agreement on it, but that won't recreate lambda school. (Austen makes this point in the interview as well).
As for self-directed learning: it also worked for me, but I do think a lot of people need extra support before they can do it effectively. I was fortunate in that I was introduced to programming as a kid and thus had lots of time to just mess around. It's harder once you've already entered the grind.
[1] https://blog.ycombinator.com/a-cs-education-thats-free-until...
Re: Lambda School wants to teach nursing
#20I am skeptical that these income sharing agreements are so great. Especially in software. Lambda School has a 9 month program that takes a 17% cut of your salary for the first 24 months of employment with a cap at $30,000. Which many students in software will hit, especially in high COL areas. It's worth noting that this is more expensive than many/most universities, which charge less than $30,000 per year (9 months…
That’s not an apples to apples comparison, as Lambda School’s schedule doesn’t align with a university schedule. You’re also using the highest possible amount to pay Lambda School back, and not factoring in downside risk, would-be interest, etc. A student will have spent about 2,000 hours in Lambda School by graduation - the equivalent of ~4 university semesters, because we go all day every day and don’t take breaks.…
It's apples to apples wrt income sharing agreements as an alternative to loans. You're of course right that there are significant curricular differences.
> A student will have spent about 2,000 hours in Lambda School by graduation - the equivalent of ~4 university semesters, because we go all day every day and don’t take breaks.
University students should be going every day and not taking breaks.
> And comparing the amount of debt vs the total possible cost doesn’t make for an accurate comparison either.
I agree that this isn't the best possible comparison, but I couldn't even find the data to make a better one. Does Lambda School publish average paybacks?
> Also note that by the time a Lambda School student is at year four, if we want to factor in the opportunity cost of time, a Lambda School student has paid Lambda School back and has three years of earnings/work experience.
On the other hand, a 4 year degree with 2+ majors is much more robust to shifts in labor market demand. Which does shift from under you feet.
In fact, that very dynamism is regularly referenced in Lambda School's marketing...
> ...and have earned an additional $250k?
So, do lambda grads not on average max out the payout, or do they on average make way less than $250k over 2 years? You can't have it both ways ;-)
To answer your question: I lived through dotcom, '08, and lots of shifts in tech stacks that corresponded with layoffs of folks who didn't have foundation skills to keep up (Java/C/mainframe programming grads from community colleges who never could "grok" the web). So I have one answer about this versatility/robustness vs. maximizing short term returns question.
But I'm sure people who have never seen a down cycle or major shift in tech have a different one.