The inception bar: a new phishing method
121–130 of 238 posts
Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#122Whenever I’m looking at an iPhone screenshot someone posted on social media on my iPhone, I try to navigate using the buttons in the image. There ought to be a long German word for that experience.
Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#123Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#124With a little polishing this would be quite the "exploit" - trap the user in your fake browser, actually load pages that are entered into the fake URL bar, replace content only on certain patterns... The only solution here is a proper line of death [0]. It defeats the purpose of the LoD when it dynamically shrinks from user action. [0]: https://textslashplain.com/2017/01/14/the-line-of-death/
Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#125Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#126Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#127Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#128I happened to have 26 tabs while loading this, and spent a minute trying to figure out how the fake bar "knew" my open tab count
Edit: saw in another comment that it's hardcoded, so it was coincidence. That makes sense.
Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#129"Ceci n'est pas un UI." This specific example may be new, but the concept of fooling users with websites containing images of the system's own UI is not new --- for example, all the fake antivirus alert boxes. That had a relatively easy mitigation --- using non-default appearance on your system (e.g. an XP-style "you have a virus!" dialog box image would just look silly if you weren't using XP with the default theme)…
Autohide menu bars are bad designs, and you have this on top of that.
Fullscreen API must be removed from browser for security reasons, new window hints should be removed too.
Re: The inception bar: a new phishing method
#130Earlier quoted context omitted.
ha I did a similar thing too. Except it was fake error messagebox and on Windows 3.1 (or might have even been 3.0?) It worked quite effectively on 3.x because you could just minimize progman.exe
We did similar with the dos prompt, which must have been about 1991.
Frankly though, I preferred the actual BBC Micros and Amiga's that those IBMs were meant to replace.