> The attorney general said Bitfinex’s problems began in 2018, when it handed over $850 million to third-party payments processor Crypto Capital Corp. to handle customers-withdrawal requests. Over the months that followed, Panama-based Crypto Capital failed to process the orders, the attorney general said. For all the noise about Tether being insolvent, it turns out that it was completely solvent? Then in 2018, Bitfi…
> For all the noise about Tether being insolvent, it turns out that it was completely solvent? I don't think this says that; it says that the ~$2bn in tether had at least $700 million in actual backing, because at least that much was transferred out of it's backing. It still could have been insufficiently backed to start with.
The primary suspicion about tether was lack of solvency, and the [edit: CFTC] subpoena went out in late 2017. It would not have taken more than some weeks to determine if the assets were not present.
It's pretty hard to imagine the AG sat on tether insolvency for 18 months.