Live data from Hacker News

EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

zdnet.com

21–30 of 203 posts

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#21
post #18
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Most people have ones issued by banks Mine was issued by Skatterverket which is the tax agency, no? Surely that's "Government issued ID". In fact, I had to give them my fingerprint and iris scan when I got my card. (Although I have been denied entry when coming back from Copenhagen with it; "It is not a travel document" was the reasoning which is completely against the Schengen agreement.)

I was rather shocked when I tried to get across from Copenhagen to Malmö with a Finnish national ID card, only to discover it wasn't valid valid for entering Sweden. Luckily they saw reason and let me through after a while but it must be horrible for the daily commuters. When I lived in Copenhagen a few years back the commuters numbered in the 10000's. I can imagine that number has gone down a lot recently.

You were without a question dealing with an incompetent border officer in that case. Finnish ID card issued to a Finnish national is a valid travel document to all EU countries, to all Nordic countries, and to Switzerland. Additionally, for the citizens of all Nordic countries, no official travel documents are required to other Nordic countries in the first place. There is only a requirement to "be able to prove your identity on request" - for which a driver's license would usually suffice.

See: https://www.poliisi.fi/identity_card/use_of_the_identity_car...

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#22

Yet another step to make things more straightforwardly hackable for interested actors. Sorry for the cynicism, but I can't help thinking that all this digitalization and automation is just plain blessing for foreign intel agencies, if not the main goal.

This, it seems like the Overton window is moving in one direction.

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#23
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was rather shocked when I tried to get across from Copenhagen to Malmö with a Finnish national ID card, only to discover it wasn't valid valid for entering Sweden. Luckily they saw reason and let me through after a while but it must be horrible for the daily commuters. When I lived in Copenhagen a few years back the commuters numbered in the 10000's. I can imagine that number has gone down a lot recently.

You were without a question dealing with an incompetent border officer in that case. Finnish ID card issued to a Finnish national is a valid travel document to all EU countries, to all Nordic countries, and to Switzerland. Additionally, for the citizens of all Nordic countries, no official travel documents are required to other Nordic countries in the first place. There is only a requirement to "be able to prove your…

> There is only a requirement to "be able to prove your identity on request" - for which a driver's license would usually suffice.

This is how travel works right now between the UK and Ireland, hence why it's such a big pain point in regards to Brexit.

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#24
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> The European Parliament voted last week to interconnect a series of border-control, migration, and law enforcement systems into a gigantic, biometrics-tracking, searchable database of EU and non-EU citizens. It is only people already known to the EU.

Understood - but most EU states would have a national ID card which would make them ‘known’ to their own government. Not sure if all include biometrics (I know that the ID cards here in France are not all like that, though passports today are) but national ID cards cover all adults and children. Just seems weird that they would not include a couple of hundred million people that they definitely know something about b…

In Netherlands they make a copy of your fingerprint for your ID card (EU-wide) or passport. The copy of that fingerprint is deleted after it's stored electronically on your ID card or passport.

There's no need to store a copy of e.g. the fingerprint anywhere else. Just sign the electronic data on the ID card/passport.

Everyone here seems to assume that having biometric data on the passport means that there's a database somewhere, while that isn't needed.

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#26
post #6

Merging existing databases into one big one might be more accurate but that's modern journalism.

Well they are creating a new database, from old datasets(that live in separate databases).

so technically you are both right. Also having it centralized allows for new features(fast cross-country lookups for example)

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#27
post #24
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Understood - but most EU states would have a national ID card which would make them ‘known’ to their own government. Not sure if all include biometrics (I know that the ID cards here in France are not all like that, though passports today are) but national ID cards cover all adults and children. Just seems weird that they would not include a couple of hundred million people that they definitely know something about b…

In Netherlands they make a copy of your fingerprint for your ID card (EU-wide) or passport. The copy of that fingerprint is deleted after it's stored electronically on your ID card or passport. There's no need to store a copy of e.g. the fingerprint anywhere else. Just sign the electronic data on the ID card/passport. Everyone here seems to assume that having biometric data on the passport means that there's a databa…

> The copy of that fingerprint is deleted after it's stored electronically on your ID card or passport.

Do you have hard proof for that deletion step?

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#28
post #6

Merging existing databases into one big one might be more accurate but that's modern journalism.

No, this is not "just" a merger! Prior to this latest crap, the databases were separate, including separate access controls, on a "need to know" basis.

Now a shitload of agencies and their agents across the EU, including in untrustworthy countries like Poland, Hungary and Austria, can access all the sensitive data in one place.

This is NOT good.

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#29
post #6

Merging existing databases into one big one might be more accurate but that's modern journalism.

No, this is not "just" a merger! Prior to this latest crap, the databases were separate, including separate access controls, on a "need to know" basis. Now a shitload of agencies and their agents across the EU, including in untrustworthy countries like Poland, Hungary and Austria, can access all the sensitive data in one place. This is NOT good.

Why did you select these particular countries, especially Austria, as an example?

Re: EU votes to create gigantic biometrics database

#30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No, this is not "just" a merger! Prior to this latest crap, the databases were separate, including separate access controls, on a "need to know" basis. Now a shitload of agencies and their agents across the EU, including in untrustworthy countries like Poland, Hungary and Austria, can access all the sensitive data in one place. This is NOT good.

Why did you select these particular countries, especially Austria, as an example?

Simple: Poland and Hungary are under multiple investigations for turning their systems to "illiberal democracies". Austria is on the list because their right-wing party FPÖ is in control of the security agencies (both police and secret service and military), which has led other EU countries to restrict information exchange with their secret services (https://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/international/spionage-...).

For what it's worth I'd also put Italy on the list, with the open fascist Salvini as Interior Minister they're also not a stellar light of democracy any more.

Post reply on HN