Live data from Hacker News

Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

citylab.com

11–20 of 62 posts

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#11
> [a] librarian [... said] “As a librarian, my gut reaction to that was, ‘You know what else is a free library? A regular library.’”

With all respect to librarians, this is a bit silly. There are public libraries that also call themselves "Free". It's a bit of an outdated distinction, sure, but they've had their names for decades. (And there still exist libraries that are not lending libraries or not open to the general public; mostly attached to universities at this point, but not "free".)

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#12
I think they have their place, though, depending on the circumstances. In my town, you don't see these in the higher-income neighborhoods at all, you see them in the lower-income neighborhoods where there are no public library branches.

They tend to be filled with light recreational reading and children's books.

The main problem I've seen with them is that they usually aren't weatherproofed enough, causing books to get water damaged, and they provide an irresistible temptation for vandals.

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#13

"Little Free Libraries predominantly appear in medium- to high-income neighborhoods" Because they don't want them vandalized or raided. "registration fee of $40 to use the Little Free Library name." OK, legit criticism. The idea you can trademark a phrase as generic and descriptive as "Little Free library" is bullshit.

It probably also puts you on their map.

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#14
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I agree. There's no reason why a LFL would affect the public library negatively. Nobody will cut funding for public libraries, because "we have a LFL now".

Want to bet? Library budgets are on the front lines, and have been for decades.

They will not be cut because of LFL, but because some people don't think libraries are important.

Those people may cite LFLs as a substitute, but I doubt even that.

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#15
post #13

"Little Free Libraries predominantly appear in medium- to high-income neighborhoods" Because they don't want them vandalized or raided. "registration fee of $40 to use the Little Free Library name." OK, legit criticism. The idea you can trademark a phrase as generic and descriptive as "Little Free library" is bullshit.

It probably also puts you on their map.

Shouldn't this kind of data just be available in a generic service like Google search/maps instead?

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#16
Virtue signaling goes both ways. Yes, there's plenty of middle class progressive virtue signaling in having a little free library, but there's also plenty in bashing them as a threat to the public library system. Progressiver-than-thou is a seriously annoying thing.

My own gripe against them isn't the virtue signaling, but rather the KonMari problem. People who read tend to treat books as sacred. Throwing books out is a sin, even if the books are, frankly, junk. I live in one of those neighborhoods they describe, with a little free library or two on every block, and they are often stuffed with garbage books that someone couldn't bear to throw out - old Danielle Steele and Steven King novels, obsolete computer books, etc. It's okay to throw books out, it really is. The magic isn't in the book, it's in the reading.

That said, there are other ways to do Good Work with books besides little free libraries and the public library system. My spouse works with a nonprofit that distributes books for underprivileged children. Every time she buys something on Amazon, she also buys a children's book - exclusively books that feature non-white characters. Her goal isn't just to get books in the hands of poor children, but to get minority kids images that look like themselves, and get the white kids images that look like someone else.

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#17
post #9

Bingo: "'We submit that these data reinforce the notion that [Little Free Libraries] are examples of performative community enhancement, driven more so by the desire to showcase one’s passion for books and education than a genuine desire to help the community in a meaningful way. [ . . . ] [Little Free Libraries] are a highly visible form of self-gratification cleverly disguised as book aid, and the effects of this v…

So what? These sorts of criticisms are irritating. "Such and such is just virtue signalling and therefore bad" makes no sense. Everyone virtue signals all the time. It's just one of those things that human beings do. Accusing others of "just" virtue signalling is itself a signal of ones own virtue (in having deeper, more meaningful motivations).

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#18
I get the perspective, but the public library folks pushing this position are really cheapening what libraries are.

Books are a commodity with low or no value very very quickly. 90% of books as a commodity are worth less than a bottle of soda within months of publication. A LFL is really a way to connect with neighbors and get rid of surplus books taking up space in a way that is potentially better than dumping them in a bin.

A public library is in my mind a nearly magical place that's about learning and information. I'm lucky to live in a place with a vibrant library system. Our local branch is full of kid and adults doing homework, reading, playing, etc. Books are a big part of the expression of that, not the mission.

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#19
post #13

"Little Free Libraries predominantly appear in medium- to high-income neighborhoods" Because they don't want them vandalized or raided. "registration fee of $40 to use the Little Free Library name." OK, legit criticism. The idea you can trademark a phrase as generic and descriptive as "Little Free library" is bullshit.

It probably also puts you on their map.

You don't need a map to find the darn things. Just leave the house every once in a while, walk around the neighborhood.

Re: Against Little Free Libraries (2017)

#20
post #5
post #2

Look I don't use the actual library as much as I want to (Seattle). When I was job hunting it was one of the last places I went to to be productive. The open hours are abysmal,(10AM-6PM) was a common one. That being said I have found use in these tiny libraries just knowing I might pick up something interesting - and I try to return or find another spot to donate a book of my own. It's not like they're stealing fundi…

I agree. There's no reason why a LFL would affect the public library negatively. Nobody will cut funding for public libraries, because "we have a LFL now".

> In September 2014, the mayor of tiny Vinton, Texas, announced plans to install five Little Free Library book-stops across town—while implementing a $50 fee for access to the El Paso Public Library system to balance state-imposed budget cuts.

From the article. I’m with you, I don’t think it’s likely, but the article did so their research and show that there’s precedent for exactly what you’re describing.

Post reply on HN