Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get it that WSL is easy for anyone to use but why not just run a real Linux in VMware or VirtualBox and you'll have 100% compatible Linux environment. Prebuilt OS image is just a single download and deploy.
Because I don't need a 100% compatible environment. WSL has better host integration and better performance in my experience, and it runs my development stack fine.
Pengwin – A Linux Distro Optimized for WSL Based on Debian
91–93 of 93 posts
Re: Pengwin – A Linux Distro Optimized for WSL Based on Debian
#92Is this actually a Linux distro, though? I've long held that "WSL" is a misnomer; it happens to be compatible with binaries compiled for Linux, but given that no Linux code is actually present, this would really be Debian GNU/NT.
What? WSL emulates linux syscalls and vfs, how is this a misnomer?
Re: Pengwin – A Linux Distro Optimized for WSL Based on Debian
#93The nicest thing has to be running IntelliJ from X11 and have it see the linux filesystem.
I can run a Yubikey with weasel-pageant and get GPG signing and SSH keychain access to github through it -- it pops up a Windows PIN entry dialog box and then works fine thereafter. You can use wslutilities (wslusc) to set up windows shortcuts to your Linux applications. I use ConEmu as my shell and it's fine.
There is a problem with HiDPI screens. I've worked around this by increasing the font size in IntelliJ, but VS Code shows up as teensy tiny.
The worst part has to be the documentation. The docs for "pengwin-setup" is basically a bunch of screenshots on their blog.