Earlier quoted context omitted.
I tried signal, much more inferior to WhatsApp in terms of functionality and usability
Put effort into improving usability of Signal then? I don't understand.
Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
11–20 of 100 posts
Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#12Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#13(As an aside, it is always a bit unsettling when a federal function is represented by something that looks like a link farm. I mean, I know you elected Trump and all, but "FedBizOpps" probably predates him by a decade)
Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#14-ability to give out your alias or username to people to reach you on whatsapp instead of a phone number, something you can change later after banning the contact.
-transcribe voice messages to enable search among them.
-ability to hide the fact that i have listened to their voice message.
-ability to hide the fact that i am on whatsapp network and receive 'add to contact' requests from people where i can accept or reject without them knowing i actually rejected.
-hide the 'online' in conversation window when im reading the message.
-save my chat history in the cloud so that i dont lose everything when i move from iOS to Android or vise versa.
-ability to save incoming and outgoing media attachments to the cloud for access later
-full desktop support for video and voice calls
-ability to record the calls, and have their transcribed texts easily searchable.
-ability to ignore certain kind of messages from certain people such as 'allow text messages only, no calls, no pictures, no videos.' etc.
Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#15Isn't that called Signal? Maybe just put the funding into extending that?
I tried signal, much more inferior to WhatsApp in terms of functionality and usability
Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#16Isn't that called Signal? Maybe just put the funding into extending that?
Interestingly, WhatsApp uses the same e2e encryption protocol under the hood... or at least it used to I know Facebook is trying to merge it with messenger which certainly means removing the e2e encryption.
Good news is this means Signal could probably be on parity with WhatsApp with a little government grant money love.
Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#17Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#18Trust us, this totally isn't another Dual_EC_DRBG
Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
Put effort into improving usability of Signal then? I don't understand.
A lot of the issues can't be solved without relying on an authoritative 3rd party (which is what facebook, whatsapp, skype, etc do). For example, because all messages are p2p, you can't view conversation history that isn't stored locally or sent by the other party upon request (which may not include deleted messages, etc).
Re: Darpa wants to make a better, more secure, version of WhatsApp
#20Isn't that called Signal? Maybe just put the funding into extending that?
I tried signal, much more inferior to WhatsApp in terms of functionality and usability
1) It's open source, so if you can code and have time, you can help.
2) Some small friction adders seem like a small price to pay to not have a facebook product installed on my phone and suck all my metadata down.