what ain't a manifold at this point
E.g., asking for a "differentiable manifold" now asks for manifolds with enough additional structure to do calculus on top of.
11–20 of 115 posts
what ain't a manifold at this point
E.g., asking for a "differentiable manifold" now asks for manifolds with enough additional structure to do calculus on top of.
Is there any way to distinguish between orientable or nonorientable surfaces when you're simply walking on it? If the bug was also 2d, I might have had some ideas hut I'm totally blanking for 3d.
Is the conclusion that a manifold is a space that looks like a lower dimensional space that it really is?
Is the conclusion that a manifold is a space that looks like a lower dimensional space that it really is?
All is well until the poor bug finds out it's on a Klein Bottle, or worse yet RP2. Is there any way to distinguish between orientable or nonorientable surfaces when you're simply walking on it? If the bug was also 2d, I might have had some ideas hut I'm totally blanking for 3d.
Draw a circle on the surface and orient it. If the surface is non-orientable then there's a way to take a long walk, return to the circle, and find that the direction of the orientation has changed.
what ain't a manifold at this point
I think everything said here can applies to just topologies.
The article also gets some details a bit wrong/fuzzy: it says you can tell if you are on a sphere by walking in a straight line infinitely far and seeing if you ever cross yourself. But this property also follows on the surface of a (rounded at the top) cone. Even if you require this property in all directions you get problems on eg a torus.
All is well until the poor bug finds out it's on a Klein Bottle, or worse yet RP2. Is there any way to distinguish between orientable or nonorientable surfaces when you're simply walking on it? If the bug was also 2d, I might have had some ideas hut I'm totally blanking for 3d.
(If you do the experiment with paper, the bug would be on the other side of the paper from where it started, but I don't think this concept of "side" exists when the strip is described as a manifold. The bug lives in the strip, it's not walking on top of it. It helps to imagine the strip to be transparent.)
For a Klein bottle the same would happen, but there the bug could also find the world mirrored along a different direction, depending on how it travelled.
I think everything said here can applies to just topologies.
That isn’t really true. Dimension isn’t so well defined in topology but is reasonably straightforward with a manifold. The article also touched on geometry (sum of angles of a triangle). To be topological a bunch of things must change. The bug walking example doesn’t work and is demoted to an analogy. All notion of distance and direction is lost. If the article were about topology then it would probably be talking ab…
I will try to be more precise about this in a subsequent article!