Live data from Hacker News

The Secret Rules For Getting Hired

shkspr.mobi

121–122 of 122 posts

Re: The Secret Rules For Getting Hired

#121
> "The whole team thought you were great. You were probably the strongest candidate overall, but we were looking for someone with experience in XYZ."

That happened to me. I suspect the experience requirement somehow changed during the interview process. So at the end of the multi-week interview process they realized they were looking for something different than what was listed on the position requirements. I'm not very upset about it. The time was wasted, sure. But I made some connections that may help later.

Re: The Secret Rules For Getting Hired

#122
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could you share some typical red flags?

I can't say they are typical, but we've had two candidates become somewhat agitated when challenged about their experience, e.g. you said you were a developer for 2 years at company X but it seems that you mostly did support. This resulted in a tirade about job titles. Another red flag for me is when candidates are asked about their level of expertise on a scale of 1 to 10 on a technology and they reply with anything…

The expertise scale level question is bogus. You'll get people with low expertise who believe their level is high because they think that's all there is to know about a technology (advanced beginners), while experienced people would rate themselves lower because they realize how much they don't know yet. And also there will be those who correctly estimate their level as average. Everybody's scale is different. You can't reliably distinguish those groups.
Post reply on HN