Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

news.ycombinator.com

591–600 of 648 posts

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#591
post #320

Android touchscreen phones with physical slide-out qwerty (though I would have preferred Colemak ;)) keyboards like the Sony Xperia Mini Pro. So much quicker and more comfortable to touch-type on (ironic, no? :)), I barely ever made any typos.

Check out the fxtec pro1: https://www.zdnet.com/article/slider-phone-reborn-fxtec-pro1...

That looks amazing... will be interesting to see if it actually releases though.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#592
post #564

Earlier quoted context omitted.

technically it wouldn't take much (or anything really) for people to transition to a v6 overlay network and get this back again. but i'm afraid that the value of an intermediary-free internet isn't really perceptible enough to drive adoption, even if you made it completely painless. I meet an awful lot of people, even in tech, that are surprised and shocked that you can use a computer thats not sitting right in front…

More relevantly its also largely out of the power of citizens to make the transition. Especially in the US where you often have no choice in ISP, if they don't provide static IPv6 addresses theres nothing you can do.

Like he said though, you can have an overlay network on top of what any ISP gives you. Like Tor does with onion services, Ethereum, DHTs, IPFS, etc. You can make peer-to-peer connections regardless of whether or not you're NAT'd. Of course this technology is still not very popular, but it's possible.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#593

Ubuntu's Unity desktop. People really hated it because (IMHO) it had a really rocky launch. Ubuntu replaced a very usable GNOME 2.x desktop with an alpha-quality replacement. And Canonical was riding high from having "won" the Linux for desktop game and was pushing their weight around, giving the impression that they were ignoring the feedback from their users. Unity wasn't without its missteps. But it matured quite…

I love how I can switch workspaces, customize the desktop and do so much more with Unity (Unity Tweak Tool comes in handy). Had to roll back to 16.04 when I could do nothing of those on 18.04.

For the first time of me using Ubuntu (ver 18.04), I was disappointed in the fact that I had to re-learn some things and then get used to the new workflow when everything in 16.04 and Unity in particular was muscle memory.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#594

The promise of a decentralised internet where the distinction between producer and consumer is entirely up to the person at the keyboard.

There's still hope in this front

Technically it is doable, what it lacking is the demand. It is this lack of demand which I deem to be the biggest problem, the fact that the average net user does not realise - or does not care - that they essentially have being herded into a panopticon where the guards are selling tickets for the show to the highest bidder. Attempts to explain this nearly always are met with indifference or hostility. The indifference is the biggest problem here given that I suspect the hostility comes from people who are in denial and as such at least are partly aware of their role in the herd.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#595

I just thought, would Linux's "init" fall under this category with systemd. I am not from Linux background but I've been reading about this recently.

I think systemd is a bad thing but I also don't think pre-systemd init systems were a "good product".

How many of them do you know well? Indeed, how many of them do you know?

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#596

I just thought, would Linux's "init" fall under this category with systemd. I am not from Linux background but I've been reading about this recently.

You should read a lot more. The predecessor of systemd was not what you think, and there was not just one. The software is not even "init".

* http://blog.darknedgy.net/technology/2015/09/05/0/

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18823871

* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13361168

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#598

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Google Reader was a success in that it dominated its niche for many years.

Have you checked ContentStudio.io Gives you an option to curate the content or follow with rich query builder.

ContentStudio.io is a great option for content curation with different levels of customization.

Re: Ask HN: Which great products didn't succeed?

#599
post #191

PS vita. Powerful handheld. Dual analog sticks. Great hardware. Lots of good games but it could never compete with the smart phones. 3DS didn't do too well either as compared to DS. I don't think we'll see a dedicated handheld gaming device any time soon. I'm sad because I don't really enjoy playing games on my mobile phone.

> I don't think we'll see a dedicated handheld gaming device any time soon. What about the Nintendo Switch?

It dosen't compare to vita.

size of Vita is more comfortable for portable gaming, and it is way more comfortable to play than Switch(controller ergonomics aren't great in Switch).

Post reply on HN